Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36759549›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Transcriptome profiling for precision cancer medicine using shallow nanopore cDNA sequencing.

Andreas Mock, Melissa Braun, Claudia Scholl, Stefan Fröhling, Cihan Erkut

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Andreas MockDivision of Translational Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Melissa BraunDivision of Translational Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Claudia SchollDivision of Applied Functional Genomics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Stefan FröhlingDivision of Translational Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Cihan ErkutDivision of Applied Functional Genomics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. cihan.erkut@nct-heidelberg.de.
Heidelberg University · DEDeutschen Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung · DENational Center for Tumor Diseases · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcriptome profiling is a mainstay of translational cancer research and is increasingly finding its way into precision oncology. While bulk RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) is widely available, high investment costs and long data return time are limiting factors for clinical applications. We investigated a portable nanopore long-read sequencing device (MinION, Oxford Nanopore Technologies) for transcriptome profiling of tumors. In particular, we investigated the impact of lower coverage than that of larger sequencing devices by comparing shallow nanopore RNA-seq data with short-read RNA-seq data generated using reversible dye terminator technology (Illumina) for ten samples representing four cancer types. Coupled with ShaNTi (Shallow Nanopore sequencing for Transcriptomics), a newly developed data processing pipeline, a turnaround time of five days was achieved. The correlation of normalized gene-level counts between nanopore and Illumina RNA-seq was high for MinION but not for very low-throughput Flongle flow cells (r = 0.89 and r = 0.24, respectively). A cost-saving approach based on multiplexing of four samples per MinION flow cell maintained a high correlation with Illumina data (r = 0.56-0.86). In addition, we compared the utility of nanopore and Illumina RNA-seq data for analysis tools commonly applied in translational oncology: (1) Shallow nanopore and Illumina RNA-seq were equally useful for inferring signaling pathway activities with PROGENy. (2) Highly expressed genes encoding kinases targeted by clinically approved small-molecule inhibitors were reliably identified by shallow nanopore RNA-seq. (3) In tumor microenvironment composition analysis, quanTIseq performed better than CIBERSORT, likely due to higher average expression of the gene set used for deconvolution. (4) Shallow nanopore RNA-seq was successfully applied to detect fusion genes using the JAFFAL pipeline. These findings suggest that shallow nanopore RNA-seq enables rapid and biologically meaningful transcriptome profiling of tumors, and warrants further exploration in precision cancer medicine studies.

Indexed as

NanoporesNanopore SequencingNeoplasmsDNA, ComplementaryGene Expression ProfilingHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansPrecision MedicineRNATranscriptomeTumor MicroenvironmentDNA, ComplementaryRNA

Identifiers

PMID36759549
PMCPMC9911782
OpenAlexW4319662739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.