Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36759545›Full record

ReviewMolecular psychiatry2023

Neurocognitive effects of stress: a metaparadigm perspective.

Eun Joo Kim, Jeansok J Kim

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular psychiatry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
13.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Stress, stress systems, and Alzheimer's disease.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Antidepressant and Cognitive-Enhancing Effects ofPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  14. Observational
  15. Heart-Brain Axis: Subclinical Cardiovascular Changes and Brain Health.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026
    Review
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Eun Joo KimDepartment of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8499-9135
Jeansok J KimDepartment of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA. jeansokk@uw.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-7964-106X
Korea University · KRUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Fear and Natural Risky Decisions in RatsR01MH099073 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI KIM, JEANSOK JOHN · 2013 to 2022
$3.9M
Dynamics of cortico-limbic circuit function during naturalistic risky decision-making in a mouse model of Alzheimer's diseaseR21AG067008 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI KIM, EUN JOO, KIM, JEANSOK JOHN · 2020 to 2020
$410k
NIA NIH HHS R21 AG067008NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH099073
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stressful experiences, both physical and psychological, that are overwhelming (i.e., inescapable and unpredictable), can measurably affect subsequent neuronal properties and cognitive functioning of the hippocampus. At the cellular level, stress has been shown to alter hippocampal synaptic plasticity, spike and local field potential activity, dendritic morphology, neurogenesis, and neurodegeneration. At the behavioral level, stress has been found to impair learning and memory for declarative (or explicit) tasks that are based on cognition, such as verbal recall memory in humans and spatial memory in rodents, while facilitating those that are based on emotion, such as differential fear conditioning in humans and contextual fear conditioning in rodents. These vertically related alterations in the hippocampus, procedurally observed after subjects have undergone stress, are generally believed to be mediated by recurrently elevated circulating hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis effector hormones, glucocorticoids, directly acting on hippocampal neurons densely populated with corticosteroid receptors. The main purposes of this review are to (i) provide a synopsis of the neurocognitive effects of stress in a historical context that led to the contemporary HPA axis dogma of basic and translational stress research, (ii) critically reappraise the necessity and sufficiency of the glucocorticoid hypothesis of stress, and (iii) suggest an alternative metaparadigm approach to monitor and manipulate the progression of stress effects at the neural coding level. Real-time analyses can reveal neural activity markers of stress in the hippocampus that can be used to extrapolate neurocognitive effects across a range of stress paradigms (i.e., resolve scaling and dichotomous memory effects issues) and understand individual differences, thereby providing a novel neurophysiological scaffold for advancing future stress research.

Indexed as

Hypothalamo-Hypophyseal SystemPituitary-Adrenal SystemFearGlucocorticoidsHippocampusHumansSpatial MemoryStress, PsychologicalGlucocorticoids

Identifiers

PMID36759545
PMCPMC9909677
OpenAlexW4319751451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.