Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36759511›Full record

ReviewNature communications2023

Medical microrobots in reproductive medicine from the bench to the clinic.

Richard Nauber, Sandhya R Goudu, Maren Goeckenjan, Martin Bornhäuser, Carla Ribeiro, Mariana Medina-Sánchez

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
20.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 111 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Two-Photon Endomicroscopy for Image-Guided Magnetic Micro-Agents.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Micro- and Nano-Bots for Infection Control.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2025
    Review
  15. Swarm Autonomy: From Agent Functionalization to Machine Intelligence.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2025
    Review
  16. Magnetic soft microrobots for erectile dysfunction therapy.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Richard Nauber *Micro- and NanoBiomedical Engineering Group (MNBE) Institute for Integrative Nanosciences, Leibniz Institute for Solid State and Materials Research (IFW), 01069, Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3295-0727
Sandhya R Goudu *Micro- and NanoBiomedical Engineering Group (MNBE) Institute for Integrative Nanosciences, Leibniz Institute for Solid State and Materials Research (IFW), 01069, Dresden, Germany.
Maren GoeckenjanMedical Clinic I, University Hospital, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
Martin BornhäuserMedical Clinic I, University Hospital, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5916-3029
Carla RibeiroMicro- and NanoBiomedical Engineering Group (MNBE) Institute for Integrative Nanosciences, Leibniz Institute for Solid State and Materials Research (IFW), 01069, Dresden, Germany.
Mariana Medina-Sánchez *Micro- and NanoBiomedical Engineering Group (MNBE) Institute for Integrative Nanosciences, Leibniz Institute for Solid State and Materials Research (IFW), 01069, Dresden, Germany. m.medina.sanchez@ifw-dresden.de.ORCID 0000-0001-6149-3732
Leibniz Institute for Solid State and Materials Research · DENational Center for Tumor Diseases · DETechnische Universität Dresden · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Medical microrobotics is an emerging field that aims at non-invasive diagnosis and therapy inside the human body through miniaturized sensors and actuators. Such microrobots can be tethered (e.g., smart microcatheters, microendoscopes) or untethered (e.g., cell-based drug delivery systems). Active motion and multiple functionalities, distinguishing microrobots from mere passive carriers and conventional nanomedicines, can be achieved through external control with physical fields such as magnetism or ultrasound. Here we give an overview of the key challenges in the field of assisted reproduction and how these new technologies could, in the future, enable assisted fertilization in vivo and enhance embryo implantation. As a case study, we describe a potential intervention in the case of recurrent embryo implantation failure, which involves the non-invasive delivery of an early embryo back to the fertilization site using magnetically-controlled microrobots. As the embryo will be in contact with the secretory oviduct fluid, it can develop under natural conditions and in synchrony with the endometrium preparation. We discuss the potential microrobot designs, including a proper selection of materials and processes, envisioning their translation from bench to animal studies and human medicine. Finally, we highlight regulatory and ethical considerations for bringing this technology to the clinic.

Indexed as

Reproductive MedicineRoboticsAnimalsFemaleHumansNanomedicineReproductionTechnology

Identifiers

PMID36759511
PMCPMC9911761
OpenAlexW4319731339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.