Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36759367›Full record

ReviewSkeletal radiology2023

Deep learning applications in osteoarthritis imaging.

Richard Kijowski, Jan Fritz, Cem M Deniz

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Skeletal radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. [Image classification of osteoarthritis based on improved shifted windows transformer and graph convolutional networks].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Richard KijowskiDepartment of Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, 660 First Avenue, 3Rd Floor, New York, NY, 10016, USA. Richard.Kijowski@nyulangone.org.
Jan FritzDepartment of Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, 660 First Avenue, 3Rd Floor, New York, NY, 10016, USA.
Cem M DenizDepartment of Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, 660 First Avenue, 3Rd Floor, New York, NY, 10016, USA.
New York University · US

Funding

TR&D 4: Revealing Microstructure: Biophysical modeling and validation for discovery and clinical careP41EB017183 · NIBIB · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI Christopher M Collins · 2014 to 2026
$19.3M
Deep Learning-based Imaging Biomarkers for Knee OsteoarthritisR01AR074453 · NIAMS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI DENIZ, CEM MURAT · 2019 to 2023
$2.5M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR074453NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB017183
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep learning (DL) is one of the most exciting new areas in medical imaging. This article will provide a review of current applications of DL in osteoarthritis (OA) imaging, including methods used for cartilage lesion detection, OA diagnosis, cartilage segmentation, and OA risk assessment. DL techniques have been shown to have similar diagnostic performance as human readers for detecting and grading cartilage lesions within the knee on MRI. A variety of DL methods have been developed for detecting and grading the severity of knee OA and various features of knee OA on X-rays using standardized classification systems with diagnostic performance similar to human readers. Multiple DL approaches have been described for fully automated segmentation of cartilage and other knee tissues and have achieved higher segmentation accuracy than currently used methods with substantial reductions in segmentation times. Various DL models analyzing baseline X-rays and MRI have been developed for OA risk assessment. These models have shown high diagnostic performance for predicting a wide variety of OA outcomes, including the incidence and progression of radiographic knee OA, the presence and progression of knee pain, and future total knee replacement. The preliminary results of DL applications in OA imaging have been encouraging. However, many DL techniques require further technical refinement to maximize diagnostic performance. Furthermore, the generalizability of DL approaches needs to be further investigated in prospective studies using large image datasets acquired at different institutions with different imaging hardware before they can be implemented in clinical practice and research studies.

Indexed as

Cartilage, ArticularDeep LearningOsteoarthritis, KneeHumansKnee JointMagnetic Resonance ImagingProspective StudiesArtificial intelligenceDeep learningKneeMRIOsteoarthritisX-rays

Identifiers

PMID36759367
PMCPMC10409879
OpenAlexW4319985404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.