ArticleTropical animal health and production2023
Non-genetic effects and repeatability estimates of semen production traits in Murrah buffalo bulls.
Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Non-genetic determinants and interaction effects on semen quality and production efficiency in Mehsana buffalo bulls: a large-scale field study.Tropical animal health and production · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objectives of this study were to determine the repeatability estimates and the effect of ejaculate, season, period, age, and bull on semen production traits in Murrah buffalo bulls maintained in an organized semen station. A data set comprising 54,268 ejaculates from 76 Murrah buffalo bulls collected across 12 years were analyzed. The analysis of variables included non-genetic factors as the fixed effects and bull as the random effect. The repeatability was estimated by the restricted maximum likelihood method (REML) using WOMBAT program. The overall least-squares means for semen volume, sperm concentration, total sperm/ejaculate, mass activity, individual motility, post-thaw motility, and frozen semen straws/ejaculate were 2.65 ml, 1222.04 million/ml, 3030.10 million, 2.64, 67.45%, 51.73%, and 128.80 doses. The repeatability estimates were 0.27, 0.25, 0.22, 0.28, 0.34, 0.27, and 0.23, respectively. The studied non-genetic factors influenced (P < 0.01) all seminal traits. Likewise, variation (P < 0.01) due to individual bull was also observed. The first ejaculate was superior in terms of ejaculate volume, sperm concentration, total sperm/ejaculate, and frozen semen straws than the second ejaculate. The south-west monsoon and summer seasons were the best seasons with better semen quality and frozen semen production. Compared to the remaining periods, during Period V (2014-2016), greater values for most seminal traits were found. Bulls above 8 years of age expressed higher semen production than the younger bulls below 4 years, whereas the best performance was observed in the age group of 12 years and above. The repeatability estimates were low to moderate ranging from 0.22 for total sperm/ejaculate to 0.34 for individual motility. A significant (P < 0.01) positive correlation was observed between the seminal traits except the negative correlation in semen volume and total sperm/ejaculate. It was concluded that all the non-genetic factors considered in this study exerted influence on studied seminal traits. Therefore, appropriate management practices can be applied to improve semen quality and quantity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.