Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36759190›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2023

Deep Neural Networks and Visuo-Semantic Models Explain Complementary Components of Human Ventral-Stream Representational Dynamics.

Kamila M Jozwik, Tim C Kietzmann, Radoslaw M Cichy, Nikolaus Kriegeskorte, Marieke Mur

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Visual Recognition Memory of Scenes Is Driven by Categorical, Not Sensory, Visual Representations.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. A deep neural network model of the primate superior colliculus for emotion recognition.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Kamila M JozwikDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EB, United Kingdom jozwik.kamila@gmail.com mmur@uwo.ca.
Tim C KietzmannInstitute of Cognitive Science, University of Osnabrück, 49069 Osnabrück, Germany.
Radoslaw M CichyDepartment of Education and Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin, 14195 Berlin, Germany.
Nikolaus KriegeskorteZuckerman Mind Brain Behavior Institute, Columbia University, New York, New York 10027.
Marieke MurDepartment of Psychology, Western University, London, Ontario N6A 3K7, Canada jozwik.kamila@gmail.com mmur@uwo.ca.ORCID 0000-0003-1749-9058
Freie Universität Berlin · DEMIND Research Institute · USOsnabrück University · DEUniversity of Cambridge · GBWestern University · CA

Funding

Wellcome Trust 206521Wellcome Trust 206521/Z/17/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep neural networks (DNNs) are promising models of the cortical computations supporting human object recognition. However, despite their ability to explain a significant portion of variance in neural data, the agreement between models and brain representational dynamics is far from perfect. We address this issue by asking which representational features are currently unaccounted for in neural time series data, estimated for multiple areas of the ventral stream via source-reconstructed magnetoencephalography data acquired in human participants (nine females, six males) during object viewing. We focus on the ability of visuo-semantic models, consisting of human-generated labels of object features and categories, to explain variance beyond the explanatory power of DNNs alone. We report a gradual reversal in the relative importance of DNN versus visuo-semantic features as ventral-stream object representations unfold over space and time. Although lower-level visual areas are better explained by DNN features starting early in time (at 66 ms after stimulus onset), higher-level cortical dynamics are best accounted for by visuo-semantic features starting later in time (at 146 ms after stimulus onset). Among the visuo-semantic features, object parts and basic categories drive the advantage over DNNs. These results show that a significant component of the variance unexplained by DNNs in higher-level cortical dynamics is structured and can be explained by readily nameable aspects of the objects. We conclude that current DNNs fail to fully capture dynamic representations in higher-level human visual cortex and suggest a path toward more accurate models of ventral-stream computations.

Indexed as

Pattern Recognition, VisualSemanticsBrainBrain MappingFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNeural Networks, ComputerVisual Perceptioncategoriesfeaturesobject recognitionrecurrent deep neural networkssource-reconstructed MEG datavision

Identifiers

PMID36759190
PMCPMC10010451
OpenAlexW4319663108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.