Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36759151›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of ophthalmology2024

Self-reported dual sensory impairment and related factors: a European population-based cross-sectional survey.

Nicolas Leveziel, Simon Marillet, Tasanee Braithwaite, Tunde Peto, Pierre Ingrand, Shahina Pardhan, Alain M Bron, Jost B Jonas, Serge Resnikoff, Little Julie Anne and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of ophthalmology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Evaluation of Functional Impacts of Vision Impairment: Progress, Challenges and Future Directions.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 10 institutions in 8 countries.

Nicolas LevezielDepartment of Ophthalmology, CHU Poitiers, Poitiers, France nicolas.leveziel@yahoo.fr.ORCID 0000-0001-8533-9457
Simon MarilletPublic Health department, CHU Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
Tasanee BraithwaiteSchool of Immunology and Microbiology and School of Life Course Sciences, Kings College, London, UK.
Tunde PetoCentre for Public Health, Faculty of Medicine Health and Life Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Belfast, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6265-0381
Pierre IngrandPublic health department, University of Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
Shahina PardhanVision and Eye Research Institute (VERI), School of Medicine, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2377-8387
Alain M BronOphthalmology, University Hospital Centre Dijon Bourgogne, Dijon, Bourgogne-Franche-Comté, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7265-931X
Jost B JonasOphthalmology, Ruprecht Karls University Heidelberg Faculty of Medicine Mannheim, Mannheim, Baden-Württemberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2972-5227
Serge ResnikoffBrien Holden Vision Institute and SOVS, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5866-4446
Little Julie AnneCentre for Optometry and Vision Science, School of Biomedical Sciences, Biomedical Sciences Research Institute, Ulster University, Coleraine, Belfast, UK.
Adrian C DavisENT and Audiology, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Catherine M McMahonHear Center, Macquarie University Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Rupert R A BourneVision and Eye Research Unit, Anglia Ruskin University Faculty of Science and Technology, Chelmsford, Essex, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8169-1645
Université de Poitiers · FRVision Eye Institute · AUBrien Holden Vision Institute · AUGuy's Hospital · GBImperial College London · GBMacquarie University · AUQueen's University Belfast · GBUniversité de Bourgogne · FRUniversity of Mannheim · DEUniversity of Ulster · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundData on population-based self-reported dual vision and hearing impairment are sparse in Europe. We aimed to investigate self-reported dual sensory impairment (DSI) in European population.

methodsA standardised questionnaire was used to collect medical and socio-economic data among individuals aged 15 years or more in 29 European countries. Individuals living in collective households or in institutions were excluded from the survey.

resultsAmong 296 677 individuals, the survey included 153 866 respondents aged 50 years old or more. The crude prevalence of DSI was of 7.54% (7.36-7.72). Among individuals aged 60 or more, 9.23% of men and 10.94% of women had DSI. Eastern and southern countries had a higher prevalence of DSI. Multivariable analyses showed that social isolation and poor self-rated health status were associated with DSI with ORs of 2.01 (1.77-2.29) and 2.33 (2.15-2.52), while higher income was associated with lower risk of DSI (OR of 0.83 (0.78-0.89). Considering country-level socioeconomic factors, Human Development Index explained almost 38% of the variance of age-adjusted prevalence of DSI.

conclusionThere are important differences in terms of prevalence of DSI in Europe, depending on socioeconomic and medical factors. Prevention of DSI does represent an important challenge for maintaining quality of life in elderly population.

Indexed as

Hearing LossQuality of LifeAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSelf ReportVision DisordersEpidemiologyVision

Identifiers

PMID36759151
PMCPMC10894815
OpenAlexW4319719652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.