Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36759143›Full record

ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2023

Persistent Opacification of the Woven EndoBridge Device: A Conebeam CT Analysis of the Bicêtre Occlusion Scale Score 1 Phenomenon.

J Caroff, S D Popescu, C Mihalea, D A Popica, L Ikka, S Gallas, A Ozanne, V Chalumeau, J Moret, J Cortese and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Persistent flow inside the Woven EndoBridge at angiographic follow-up: A multicenter study.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

J CaroffFrom the Department of Interventional Neuroradiology (J. Caroff, S.D.P., C.M., D.A.P., L.I., S.G., A.O., V.C., J.M., J. Cortese, L.S.), NEURI Brain Vascular Center, Bicêtre Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris-Saclay University, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France jildaz.carof@aphp.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-0029-1835
S D PopescuFrom the Department of Interventional Neuroradiology (J. Caroff, S.D.P., C.M., D.A.P., L.I., S.G., A.O., V.C., J.M., J. Cortese, L.S.), NEURI Brain Vascular Center, Bicêtre Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris-Saclay University, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France.ORCID 0000-0003-0932-0775
C MihaleaFrom the Department of Interventional Neuroradiology (J. Caroff, S.D.P., C.M., D.A.P., L.I., S.G., A.O., V.C., J.M., J. Cortese, L.S.), NEURI Brain Vascular Center, Bicêtre Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris-Saclay University, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France.ORCID 0000-0002-8260-8284
D A PopicaFrom the Department of Interventional Neuroradiology (J. Caroff, S.D.P., C.M., D.A.P., L.I., S.G., A.O., V.C., J.M., J. Cortese, L.S.), NEURI Brain Vascular Center, Bicêtre Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris-Saclay University, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0948-0472
L IkkaFrom the Department of Interventional Neuroradiology (J. Caroff, S.D.P., C.M., D.A.P., L.I., S.G., A.O., V.C., J.M., J. Cortese, L.S.), NEURI Brain Vascular Center, Bicêtre Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris-Saclay University, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France.ORCID 0000-0002-6739-3692
S GallasFrom the Department of Interventional Neuroradiology (J. Caroff, S.D.P., C.M., D.A.P., L.I., S.G., A.O., V.C., J.M., J. Cortese, L.S.), NEURI Brain Vascular Center, Bicêtre Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris-Saclay University, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7189-8888
A OzanneFrom the Department of Interventional Neuroradiology (J. Caroff, S.D.P., C.M., D.A.P., L.I., S.G., A.O., V.C., J.M., J. Cortese, L.S.), NEURI Brain Vascular Center, Bicêtre Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris-Saclay University, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France.ORCID 0000-0002-2730-6400
V ChalumeauFrom the Department of Interventional Neuroradiology (J. Caroff, S.D.P., C.M., D.A.P., L.I., S.G., A.O., V.C., J.M., J. Cortese, L.S.), NEURI Brain Vascular Center, Bicêtre Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris-Saclay University, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7753-7186
J MoretFrom the Department of Interventional Neuroradiology (J. Caroff, S.D.P., C.M., D.A.P., L.I., S.G., A.O., V.C., J.M., J. Cortese, L.S.), NEURI Brain Vascular Center, Bicêtre Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris-Saclay University, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France.ORCID 0000-0002-2086-2973
J CorteseFrom the Department of Interventional Neuroradiology (J. Caroff, S.D.P., C.M., D.A.P., L.I., S.G., A.O., V.C., J.M., J. Cortese, L.S.), NEURI Brain Vascular Center, Bicêtre Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris-Saclay University, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1616-9113
L SpelleFrom the Department of Interventional Neuroradiology (J. Caroff, S.D.P., C.M., D.A.P., L.I., S.G., A.O., V.C., J.M., J. Cortese, L.S.), NEURI Brain Vascular Center, Bicêtre Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris-Saclay University, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France.ORCID 0000-0002-6748-8528
Université Paris-Saclay · FRInserm · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeSome Woven EndoBridge devices present a persistent intradevice opacification at imaging follow-up, described as the Bicêtre Occlusion Scale Score 1 (BOSS 1) phenomenon. The clinical implications remain unknown. We aimed here to analyze the factors influencing this occurrence and to precisely describe the evolution of BOSS 1 with time using conebeam CT. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed a prospectively maintained Woven EndoBridge database at our tertiary center and included all patients with isolated BOSS 1 and BOSS 1 associated with small neck remnant (BOSS 1 + 2).

resultsTwo hundred sixty-seven aneurysms were treated with a Woven EndoBridge device between July 2012 and December 2021. Follow-up with DSA was available for 220 aneurysms (median, 5 months), among which BOSS 1 and 1 + 2 were found in 9.1% (20/220) (95% CI, 5.5%-12.7%). A second DSA follow-up (median, 17 months) was performed in 15 of these 20 aneurysms, which revealed that 40% had evolved to complete Woven EndoBridge occlusion, 33% showed a decreased persistent opacification, and 27% remained stable. BOSS 1 was significantly associated with postoperative antiplatelet medication, a lower aneurysm aspect ratio, and the use of the Woven EndoBridge 17 (

conclusionsIsolated persistent flow inside the Woven EndoBridge device at follow-up is rare and notably associated with antiplatelet prescription. It seems to present a benign course in most cases.

Indexed as

Embolization, TherapeuticEndovascular ProceduresIntracranial AneurysmHumansRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID36759143
PMCPMC10187822
OpenAlexW4319724240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.