Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36759027›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Supporting implementation of interventions to address ethnicity-related health inequities: frameworks, facilitators and barriers - a scoping review protocol.

Papillon Gustafson, Yasmin Abdul Aziz, Michelle Lambert, Karen Bartholomew, Rachel Brown, Peter Carswell, Adam Fusheini, Mihi Ratima, Patricia Priest, Sue Crengle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Papillon GustafsonNgāi Tahu Māori Health Research Unit, University of Otago Division of Health Sciences, Dunedin, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-8645-8490
Yasmin Abdul AzizNgāi Tahu Māori Health Research Unit, University of Otago Division of Health Sciences, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Michelle LambertNgāi Tahu Māori Health Research Unit, University of Otago Division of Health Sciences, Dunedin, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-0439-7557
Karen BartholomewTe Whatu Ora - Health New Zealand Waitematā, Takapuna, New Zealand.
Rachel BrownNational Hauora Coalition, Auckland, New Zealand.
Peter CarswellSynergia Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand.
Adam FusheiniPreventive and Social Medicine, University of Otago Dunedin School of Medicine, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Mihi RatimaTaumata Associates, Hāwera, New Zealand.
Patricia PriestPreventive and Social Medicine, University of Otago Dunedin School of Medicine, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Sue CrengleNgāi Tahu Māori Health Research Unit, University of Otago Division of Health Sciences, Dunedin, New Zealand sue.crengle@otago.ac.nz.ORCID 0000-0001-9367-1492

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHealth inequities are differences in health between groups of people that are avoidable, unfair and unjust. Achieving equitable health outcomes requires approaches that recognise and account for the differences in levels of advantage between groups. Implementation science, which studies how to translate evidence-based interventions into routine practice, is increasingly recognised as an approach to address health inequities by identifying factors and processes that enable equitable implementation of interventions. This article describes the protocol for a scoping review of the literature relating to the equitable implementation of interventions, focusing on ethnicity-related health inequities. The scoping review aims to identify equity-focused implementation science theories, models and frameworks (TMFs) and to synthesise and analyse the evidence relating to the factors that aid or inhibit equitable implementation of health interventions. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The scoping review is guided by the methodology developed by Arksey and O'Malley and enhanced by Levac and colleagues. Relevant literature will be identified by searching electronic databases, grey literature, hand-searching key journals and searching the reference lists and citations of studies that meet the inclusion criteria. We will focus on literature published from 2011 to the present. Titles, abstracts and full-text articles will be screened independently by two researchers; any disagreements will be resolved through discussion with another researcher. Extracted data will be summarised and analysed to address the scoping review aims. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The scoping review will map the available literature on equity-focused implementation science TMFs and the facilitators and barriers to equitable implementation of interventions. Ethical approval is not required. Dissemination of the results of the review will include publications in peer-review journals and conference and stakeholder presentations. Findings from the review will support those implementing interventions to ensure that the implementation pathway and processes are equitable, thereby improving health outcomes and reducing existing inequities.

Indexed as

EthnicityResearch DesignHumansImplementation SciencePeer ReviewScoping Reviews as Topichealth equityorganisation of health servicespublic healthqualitative researchquality in health care

Identifiers

PMID36759027
PMCPMC9923318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.