Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36759011›Full record

Trial reportOpen heart2023

Mobile-phone text messaging to promote ideal cardiovascular health in women.

Monica Acevedo, Paola Varleta, Carolina Casas-Cordero, Amalia Berríos, Carlos Navarrete, Giovanna Valentino, Rosario Lopez, Sidney C Smith

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Open heart, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Monica AcevedoFundación SOCHICAR (Sociedad Chilena de Cardiología y Cirugía Cardiovascular), Santiago, Chile macevedo@med.puc.cl.ORCID 0000-0002-7989-6633
Paola VarletaFundación SOCHICAR (Sociedad Chilena de Cardiología y Cirugía Cardiovascular), Santiago, Chile.ORCID 0000-0002-4508-3490
Carolina Casas-CorderoInstituto de Sociología, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Amalia BerríosFundación SOCHICAR (Sociedad Chilena de Cardiología y Cirugía Cardiovascular), Santiago, Chile.
Carlos NavarreteDepartamento de Matemáticas, Universidad de La Serena, La Serena, Chile.
Giovanna ValentinoCarrera de Nutrición y Dietética, Ciencias de la Salud, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Rosario LopezCarrera de Kinesiología, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad San Sebastián - Campus Bellavista, Santiago de Chile, Chile.
Sidney C SmithCardiovascular Department, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile · CLFundación Chile · CLSan Sebastián University · CLUniversity of La Serena · CLUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIdeal cardiovascular health (CVH) was developed to promote CVH as a key component of primordial prevention. Mobile short message service (SMS) is useful for improving health behaviours. We aim to test the effectiveness of SMS intervention in women to improve CVH.

methodsIn a single-blinded, randomised, controlled study, 620 women, aged 35-70 years, without cardiovascular disease, were enrolled in SMS intervention versus no SMS. CVH metrics by self-report, and biochemical laboratory, anthropometric and blood pressure measurements were collected during home visits at baseline and 9 months. Women were categorised as having poor (0-2), intermediate (3-4) or ideal (5-7) CVH according to the number of ideal CVH metrics. Participants were randomised 1:1 to SMS intervention versus control. SMS was sent every 5-6 days for 9 months. The primary outcome was the difference in the proportion of women with ideal CVH between SMS and control groups at 9 months. Rates of intermediate CVH, poor CVH and each of the seven ideal CV health metrics at 9 months were key secondary endpoints.

resultsAt 9 months, there was no significant difference between groups for the primary outcome (16.3% at baseline and 13.3% at 9 months, and 10.1% and 11.1%, in SMS and control groups, respectively, adjusted RR 1.0; 95% CI 0.6 to 1.6). Similarly, there were no significant differences between groups for the key secondary endpoints. SMS had an acceptance rate of 94.9%.

conclusionsBehavioural SMS intervention did not improve rates of ideal CVH in women, despite being feasible and well received. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: 6377.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesCell PhoneText MessagingFemaleHumansResearch DesignGlobal HealthOutcome Assessment, Health CareRISK FACTORS

Identifiers

PMID36759011
PMCPMC9923351
OpenAlexW4319787561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.