ArticleAnnals of pediatric endocrinology & metabolism2023
Comparison of the effect of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist dosage in girls with central precocious puberty.
Article in Annals of pediatric endocrinology & metabolism, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Commentary on "Treatment of overweight and obese girls experiencing central precocious puberty: a comparison of the effectiveness of leuprolide acetate and triptorelin pamoate".Annals of pediatric endocrinology & metabolism · 2025Article
- Treatment of overweight and obese girls experiencing central precocious puberty: a comparison of the effectiveness of leuprolide acetate and triptorelin pamoate.Annals of pediatric endocrinology & metabolism · 2025Article
- Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Leuprorelin Treatment in Children with Central Precocious Puberty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Clinical Outcomes and Quality of Life in Children with Central Precocious Puberty: A Pragmatic Analysis.Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThere are no definite guidelines on the optimal dosage of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist for treatment of central precocious puberty (CPP). We compared growth outcomes of GnRH agonist at different dosages in girls with idiopathic CPP to assess the optimal dosage.
methodsThis retrospective study included 86 girls with idiopathic CPP who had been treated with GnRH agonist for at least one year and had attained their final adult height. Leuprolide was given as fixed dosage (3.75 mg every 4 weeks in body weight >20 kg, n=72) or weight-based dosage (60-85 μg/kg every 4 weeks, n=14). We compared suppression of advanced puberty and treatment response between the 2 groups.
resultsPeak estradiol and luteinizing hormone and bone age (BA)/chronological age after injection of GnRH agonist were effectively suppressed in both groups. In both groups, the height standard deviation score (SDS) for BA increased after treatment. Final adult height (FAH) (fixed dosage group,160.8±4.1 cm and weight-based dosage group, 161.2±4.4 cm) was significantly higher than the initial predicted adult height (PAH) (155.5±3.3 and 156.1±3.6 cm, respectively) (both P<0.001) and similar to midparental height (159.8±3.3 and 160.6±3.7 cm, respectively). There were no differences in gain in height SDS for BA and gain in height (FAH-PAH at the start) between the 2 groups.
conclusionThere were no differences in treatment outcome between fixed dosage (3.75 mg/4 wk) and weight-based dosage (60-85 μg/kg/4wk) of GnRH agonist. Therefore, a fixed dosage of GnRH agonist can be used more conveniently for CPP treatment without growth oversuppression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.