ReviewPloS one2023
Interventions for depression and anxiety among people with diabetes mellitus: Review of systematic reviews.
Review in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Randomized trial of an integrated care intervention among Latino adults: Sustained effects on diabetes management.Translational behavioral medicine · 2024Trial
- Embedding psychological care in diabetes services: Why it's time to innovate and integrate.Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association · 2026Review
- Evaluating the Specific Role of Dysfunctional Metacognitive Beliefs and Testing a Metacognitive Model of Emotional Distress in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus.Journal of clinical psychology in medical settings · 2026Article
- Mindfulness-based interventions and cognitive behavioral therapy for depression, anxiety, and stress in adults with chronic conditions: a stratified subgroup meta-analysis.Npj mental health research · 2026Article
- Primary care and community interventions for multimorbidity involving depression or anxiety: systematic review with meta-analysis.BMJ medicine · 2026Article
- Prevalence and factors associated with comorbid depression and anxiety in patients with diabetes mellitus attending a national referral hospital in Uganda.PLOS mental health · 2026Article
- Neuronal CCL2 responds to hyperglycaemia and contributes to anxiety disorders in the context of diabetes.Nature metabolism · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence as a Tool for Self-Care in Patients with Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes-An Integrative Literature Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Exploring patient and health care provider perspectives on barriers to diabetic retinopathy screening in public health facilities in North India.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Changes in retinal capillary density in female with type 2 diabetes and gestational diabetes-an analysis based on OCTA technology.International journal of ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Effect of a nursing intervention based on nutritional support on biochemical parameters and quality of life in patients with hyperthyroidism combined with diabetes mellitus.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
- Improvement in symptoms of anxiety and depression in individuals with type 2 diabetes: retrospective analysis of an intensive lifestyle modification program.BMC psychiatry · 2024Article
- Examining the association between delay discounting, delay aversion and physical activity in Chinese adults with type-2 diabetes mellitus.World journal of diabetes · 2024Article
- Editorial: Diabetes and depression.Frontiers in clinical diabetes and healthcare · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This review of systematic reviews of randomized clinical trials summarized the available evidence regarding the effectiveness and safety of interventions to treat depression and/or anxiety in people with type 1 and type 2 diabetes. The sources of information searched were the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science and LILACS, until up to December 1st, 2022. The interventions were compared with placebo, active control or usual care. The measured primary outcomes were improvement in depression and anxiety remission, reduction of diabetes-specific emotional distress; and improvement in quality of life. Two reviewers, independently, selected the reviews, extracted their data, and assessed their methodological quality using AMSTAR-2. A narrative synthesis of the findings was performed, according to the type of intervention and type of diabetes. Thirteen systematic reviews that included 28,307 participants were analyzed. The reviews had at least one critical methodological flaw. Cognitive Behavioral Therapy improved the mainly depression, glycemic values (n = 5 reviews) and anxiety (n = 1), in adults and elderly with diabetes. Collaborative care (n = 2) and health education (n = 1) improved depression and glycemic values, in adults with diabetes. Pharmacological treatment (n = 2) improved depression outcomes only. The quality of the evidence was low to moderate, when reported. The interventions reported in literature and mainly the Cognitive Behavioral Therapy can be effective to treat people with diabetes and depression; however, some findings must be confirmed. This study can guide patients, their caregivers and health professionals in making decisions concerning the use of these interventions in the mental healthcare of people with diabetes. Protocol Registration: PROSPERO (CRD42021224587).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.