Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36757991›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

In vitro evaluation of dioscin and protodioscin against ER-positive and triple-negative breast cancer.

Najat Bouchmaa, Reda Ben Mrid, Youssef Bouargalne, Sana Ajouaoi, Francesco Cacciola, Rachid El Fatimy, Mohamed Nhiri, Abdelmajid Zyad

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Antioxidant Enzymes and Their Potential Use in Breast Cancer Treatment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Najat BouchmaaFaculty of Science and Technology, Team of Experimental Oncology and Natural Substances, Cellular and Molecular Immuno-Pharmacology, Sultan Moulay Slimane University, Beni-Mellal, Morocco.ORCID 0000-0002-2757-6224
Reda Ben MridInstitute of Medical and Biological Sciences, Mohammed VI Polytechnic University (UM6P), Ben-Guerir, Morocco.
Youssef BouargalneFaculty of Science and Technology, Laboratory of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, Abdelmalek Essaadi University, Tangier, Morocco.
Sana AjouaoiFaculty of Science and Technology, Team of Experimental Oncology and Natural Substances, Cellular and Molecular Immuno-Pharmacology, Sultan Moulay Slimane University, Beni-Mellal, Morocco.
Francesco CacciolaDepartment of Biomedical, Dental, Morphological and Functional Imaging Sciences, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1296-7633
Rachid El FatimyInstitute of Medical and Biological Sciences, Mohammed VI Polytechnic University (UM6P), Ben-Guerir, Morocco.
Mohamed NhiriFaculty of Science and Technology, Laboratory of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, Abdelmalek Essaadi University, Tangier, Morocco.
Abdelmajid ZyadFaculty of Science and Technology, Team of Experimental Oncology and Natural Substances, Cellular and Molecular Immuno-Pharmacology, Sultan Moulay Slimane University, Beni-Mellal, Morocco.
Abdelmalek Essaâdi University · MAUniversité Sultan Moulay Slimane · MAUniversité Mohammed VI Polytechnique · MAUniversity of Messina · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Women's breast cancer is one of the most significant healthcare issues for the human race that demands a proactive strategy for a cure. In this study, the cytotoxic activity (MTT assay) of two natural steroidal compounds, protodioscin and dioscin, against two major subtypes of human breast cancer estrogen receptor-positive (ER-positive)/MCF-7 and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC)/MDA-MB-468), was assessed. The clonogenic capacity was evaluated using the clonogenic assay. Oxidative stress was determined by measuring the formation of malondialdehyde and H2O2 and the assessment of total antioxidant enzyme activities (SOD, GPx, GR, and TrxR). Protodioscin and dioscin were highly cytotoxic against the tested cell lines (1.53 μM <IC50< 6 μM) with low cytotoxicity on normal cells (PBMC; IC50 ≥ 50 μM). Interestingly, these compounds were responsible for a substantial decrease in the clonogenic capacity of both cell lines. Moreover, dioscin was able to reduce the cell motility of the invasive breast cancer cells (MDA-MB-468). At the molecular level, the two treatments resulted in an increase of reactive oxygen species. Notably, both compounds were responsible for decreasing the enzymatic activities of glutathione reductase and thioredoxin reductase. On the basis of such considerations, protodioscin and dioscin may serve as promising natural compounds to treat TNBC and ER-positive breast cancer through the induction of oxidative stress.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsBreast NeoplasmsTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsAntioxidantsCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationDiosgeninEndoplasmic ReticulumFemaleHumansHydrogen PeroxideLeukocytes, MononuclearSaponinsAntineoplastic AgentsAntioxidantsdioscinDiosgeninHydrogen PeroxideprotodioscinSaponins

Identifiers

PMID36757991
PMCPMC9910703
OpenAlexW4319657033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.