Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36757987›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

The social representations of diagnosing Lyme disease.

C Puppo, Y Hansmann, L Moinot, X Duval, C Chirouze, M Préau

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

C PuppoUMR1296, Université Lyon 2, Lyon, France.ORCID 0000-0002-5713-0362
Y HansmannCHRU de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
L MoinotUniv. Bordeaux, ISPED, INSERM Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, UMR 1219, CIC1401-EC, CHU Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
X DuvalHôpital Bichat-Claude Bernard, Paris, France.
C ChirouzeCHRU de Besançon, Besançon, France.
M PréauUMR1296, Université Lyon 2, Lyon, France.
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besançon · FRHôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg · FRUniversité de Bordeaux · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social science studies on the controversy surrounding Lyme disease (LD) focused on the opposition between the "mainstream" and biomedical approach on one side and the "Lyme-literate" one on the other side, the latter claiming the existence of the chronic form of LD. The qualitative and exploratory study 'C18-48 Quali-Explo-PIQTIQ' (2019) investigated the social representations of LD in patients bitten by a tick. Twenty-four semi-structured interviews were conducted in three French medical units. Thematic and patient trajectory analyses were performed. Our results showed that, after the tick bite, some patients presented an "illness without disease" condition, characterised by uncertainty. In some cases, they consulted "Lyme-literate" health providers and received a diagnosis of chronic LD. This diagnosis was obtained by prescribing unassessed biological testing, providing an objective result and clinical categorisation. Unlike literature on the "Lyme-literate" approach, this diagnostic procedure involved some biomedical operations.

Indexed as

Bites and StingsLyme DiseasePost-Lyme Disease SyndromeTick BitesTicksAnimalsHumans

Identifiers

PMID36757987
PMCPMC9910640
OpenAlexW4319655825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.