Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36757690›Full record

Trial reportJAMA oncology2023

Hyaluronic Acid Spacer for Hypofractionated Prostate Radiation Therapy: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Neil F Mariados, Peter F Orio, Zvi Schiffman, Thanh John Van, Alexander Engelman, Rizwan Nurani, Steven M Kurtzman, Escarlata Lopez, Michael Chao, Thomas P Boike and 13 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 49 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
21.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04189913 withheldnot on this map

[Trial of device that is not approved or cleared by the U.S. FDA]

Typen_aSponsor[Redacted]
NCT07210502 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Comparing the Side Effects of Low Dose Rate Brachytherapy Against Ultra-Hypofractionated Radiotherapy Using Spacer Gel Treatment in Men With Cambridge Prognostic Groups (CPG) 1 to 3 (NCCN Low to Intermediate Risk) Prostate Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorRoyal Surrey County Hospital NHS Foundation TrustRan2025 to 2030Enrolled220ConditionsProstate AdenocarcinomaArms4D Low Dose Rate Prostate Brachytherapy, Ultra-hypofractionated Radiotherapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Perirectal spacers and endorectal balloons in external beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer: a review of prospective studies.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2026
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Toxicity of rectal preparation strategies in ultra-hypofractionated SBRT for prostate cancer.Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Neil F MariadosCancer Care of Western New York, Buffalo, New York.
Peter F OrioBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Zvi SchiffmanHouston Metro Urology, Houston, Texas.
Thanh John VanHouston Metro Urology, Houston, Texas.
Alexander EngelmanFlorida Urology Partners, Tampa, Florida.
Rizwan NuraniWestern Radiation Oncology, Campbell, California.
Steven M KurtzmanWestern Radiation Oncology, Campbell, California.
Escarlata LopezVithas La Milagrosa Hospital, Calle de Modesto Lafuente, Madrid, Spain.
Michael ChaoRingwood Private Hospital, East Victoria, Australia.
Thomas P BoikeGenesisCare, Troy, Michigan.
Alvaro A MartinezGenesisCare, Troy, Michigan.
Glen GejermanNew Jersey Urology, Saddle Brook, New Jersey.
John LedererThe Cancer Center of Hawaii, Honolulu.
John E SylvesterGenesisCare, Lakewood Ranch, Florida.
Gregory BellAustin Cancer Center, Austin, Texas.
Douglas RiveraAustin Cancer Center, Austin, Texas.
Neal ShoreCarolina Urologic Research Center, Myrtle Beach, South Carolina.
Katie MillerM Squared Associates, New York, New York.
Boris SinayukRhode Island Medical Imaging, Warwick, Rhode Island.
Michael L SteinbergUniversity of California, Los Angeles.
Daniel A LowUniversity of California, Los Angeles.
Amar U KishanUniversity of California, Los Angeles.
Martin T KingBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
University of California, Los Angeles · USMetro Urology · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USCancerCare · USCancer Center of Hawaii · USCarolina Urologic Research Center · USDana-Farber Cancer Institute · USFlorida Urology Associates · USNew Jersey Urology · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Hypofractionated radiation therapy (RT) for prostate cancer has been associated with greater acute grade 2 gastrointestinal (GI) toxic effects compared with conventionally fractionated RT. Objective: To evaluate whether a hyaluronic acid rectal spacer could (1) improve rectal dosimetry and (2) affect acute grade 2 or higher GI toxic effects for hypofractionated RT. Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized clinical trial was conducted from March 2020 to June 2021 among 12 centers within the US, Australia, and Spain, with a 6-month follow-up. Adult patients with biopsy-proven, T1 to T2 prostate cancer with a Gleason score 7 or less and prostate-specific antigen level of 20 ng/mL or less (to convert to μg/L, multiply by 1) were blinded to the treatment arms. Of the 260 consented patients, 201 patients (77.3%) were randomized (2:1) to the presence or absence of the spacer. Patients were stratified by intended 4-month androgen deprivation therapy use and erectile quality. Main Outcomes and Measures: For the primary outcome, we hypothesized that more than 70% of patients in the spacer group would achieve a 25% or greater reduction in the rectal volume receiving 54 Gy (V54). For the secondary outcome, we hypothesized that the spacer group would have noninferior acute (within 3 months) grade 2 or higher GI toxic effects compared with the control group, with a margin of 10%. Results: Of the 201 randomized patients, 8 (4.0%) were Asian, 26 (12.9%) Black, 42 (20.9%) Hispanic or Latino, and 153 (76.1%) White; the mean (SD) age for the spacer group was 68.6 (7.2) years and 68.4 (7.3) years for the control group. For the primary outcome, 131 of 133 (98.5%; 95% CI, 94.7%-99.8%) patients in the spacer group experienced a 25% or greater reduction in rectum V54, which was greater than the minimally acceptable 70% (P < .001). The mean (SD) reduction was 85.0% (20.9%). For the secondary outcome, 4 of 136 patients (2.9%) in the spacer group and 9 of 65 patients (13.8%) in the control group experienced acute grade 2 or higher GI toxic effects (difference, -10.9%; 95% 1-sided upper confidence limit, -3.5; P = .01). Conclusions and Relevance: The trial results suggest that rectal spacing with hyaluronic acid improved rectal dosimetry and reduced acute grade 2 or higher GI toxic effects. Rectal spacing should potentially be considered for minimizing the risk of acute grade 2 or higher toxic effects for hypofractionated RT. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04189913.

Indexed as

Prostatic NeoplasmsRadiation InjuriesAdultAgedAndrogen AntagonistsHumansHyaluronic AcidMaleProstateAndrogen AntagonistsHyaluronic Acid

Identifiers

PMID36757690
PMCPMC9912169
OpenAlexW4319656512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.