Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36757625›Full record

ArticleArchives of microbiology2023

Evaluation of bacterial diversity in a swine manure composting system contaminated with veterinary antibiotics (VAs).

Robson Evaldo Gehlen Bohrer, Elvis Carissimi, Divanilde Guerra, Danni Maisa da Silva, Eduardo Lorensi de Souza, Márlon Castro de Vasconcelos, Delmira Beatriz Wolf, Adriane de Assis Lawisch Rodriguez

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of microbiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Robson Evaldo Gehlen BohrerDepartment of Graduate Studies in Civil Engineering, Technologies Center, Federal University of Santa Maria, Camobi, Santa Maria, RS, 97105-900, Brazil. robson-bohrer@uergs.edu.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2001-8983
Elvis CarissimiDepartment of Graduate Studies in Civil Engineering, Technologies Center, Federal University of Santa Maria, Camobi, Santa Maria, RS, 97105-900, Brazil.
Divanilde GuerraTrês Passos Unit, State University of Rio Grande do Sul (UERGS), Rua Cipriano Barata, 211, Três Passos, RS, 98600-000, Brazil.
Danni Maisa da SilvaTrês Passos Unit, State University of Rio Grande do Sul (UERGS), Rua Cipriano Barata, 211, Três Passos, RS, 98600-000, Brazil.
Eduardo Lorensi de SouzaTrês Passos Unit, State University of Rio Grande do Sul (UERGS), Rua Cipriano Barata, 211, Três Passos, RS, 98600-000, Brazil.
Márlon Castro de VasconcelosTrês Passos Unit, State University of Rio Grande do Sul (UERGS), Rua Cipriano Barata, 211, Três Passos, RS, 98600-000, Brazil.
Delmira Beatriz WolfDepartment of Graduate Studies in Civil Engineering, Technologies Center, Federal University of Santa Maria, Camobi, Santa Maria, RS, 97105-900, Brazil.
Adriane de Assis Lawisch RodriguezGraduation Program in Environmental Technology, University of Santa Cruz do Sul (UNISC), Santa Cruz do Sul, RS, 96815-900, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Composting has become an alternative for the treatment of organic effluents, due to its low cost, easy handling, and a great capacity for treating swine manure. As it is a biological process, many microorganisms are involved during the composting process and act in the degradation of organic matter and nutrients and also have the ability to degrade contaminants and accelerate the transformations during composting. The objective of this work was to identify microorganisms present in the swine effluent composting system, under the contamination by most used veterinary drugs in Brazil. The composting took place for 150 days, there was an addition of 200 L of manure (these 25 L initially contaminated with 17 antibiotics) in 25 kg of eucalyptus wood shavings. The microorganisms were measured at times (0 until 150 days) and were identified by the V3-V4 regions of the 16S rRNA for Bacteria, by means of next-generation sequencing (NSG). The results show seven different bacterial phyla (Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, Acidobacteria, Actinobacteria, Spirochaetota and Tenericutes) and 70 bacterial genera (more than 1% significance), of which the most significant ones were Pseudomonas, Sphingobacterium, Devosia, Brucella, Flavisolibacter, Sphingomonas and Nitratireductor. The genus Brucella was found during mesophilic and thermophilic phases, and this genus has not yet been reported an in article involving composting process. With the results obtained, the potential for adaptation of the bacterial community was observed, being under the influence of antibiotics for veterinary use.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsCompostingAnimalsBacteriaBacteroidetesManureRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSoilSoil MicrobiologySwineAnti-Bacterial AgentsManureRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSoilAlternativeCompostingMicroorganismTransformationVeterinary drugs

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.