Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36757571›Full record

ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2023

Development of a standard set of PROs and generic PROMs for Dutch medical specialist care : Recommendations from the Outcome-Based Healthcare Program Working Group Generic PROMs.

Martijn Oude Voshaar, Caroline B Terwee, Lotte Haverman, Bas van der Kolk, Marleen Harkes, Christiaan S van Woerden, Fenna van Breda, Stephanie Breukink, Irma de Hoop, Hester Vermeulen and 11 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. A COSMIN systematic review of generic patient-reported outcome measures in Switzerland.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Development of a Core Patient-Reported Outcome (Measures) Set for Pediatric Physical Therapy.Pediatric physical therapy : the official publication of the Section on Pediatrics of the American Physical Therapy Association · 2026
    Article
  5. Measurement properties of the USER-Participation Restriction subscale and PROMISQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. 'So Let's Go On Like This?'-Shared Decision-Making and the Use of Outcome Information in Routine Care Management for People With Multiple Sclerosis.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. The impact of endoscopic treatment on health-related quality of life in patients with Barrett's neoplasia: a scoping review.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2024
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Martijn Oude VoshaarNational Health Care Institute (Zorginstituut Nederland), Diemen, The Netherlands. a.h.oudevoshaar@utwente.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2438-9973
Caroline B TerweeNational Health Care Institute (Zorginstituut Nederland), Diemen, The Netherlands.
Lotte HavermanNational Health Care Institute (Zorginstituut Nederland), Diemen, The Netherlands.
Bas van der KolkNational Health Care Institute (Zorginstituut Nederland), Diemen, The Netherlands.
Marleen HarkesDutch Society of Medical Specialists, Amphia Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Christiaan S van WoerdenDutch Society of Medical Specialists, Amphia Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Fenna van BredaDutch Society of Medical Specialists, Amphia Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Stephanie BreukinkDutch Society of Medical Specialists, Amphia Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Irma de HoopDutch Nurses' Association, Amphia Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Hester VermeulenDutch Nurses' Association, Amphia Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Evelien de GraafDutch Nurses' Association, Amphia Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Jan HazelzetDutch Federation of University Medical Centres, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Barbara van LeidenNational Association of Dutch Health Insurers, Zeist, The Netherlands.
Jozette StienenDutch Hospital Association &, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands.
Marian HoekstraPrivate Clinics Netherlands, Zoetermeer, The Netherlands.
Hans BartThe Netherlands Patients Federation, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Hester van BommelPharos - Dutch Centre of Expertise On Health Disparities, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Domino DetermannNational Health Care Institute (Zorginstituut Nederland), Diemen, The Netherlands.
Mariët VerburgNational Health Care Institute (Zorginstituut Nederland), Diemen, The Netherlands.
Philip van der WeesNational Health Care Institute (Zorginstituut Nederland), Diemen, The Netherlands.
Anna J BeurskensNational Health Care Institute (Zorginstituut Nederland), Diemen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe added value of measuring patient-reported outcomes (PROs) for delivering patient-centered care and assessment of healthcare quality is increasingly evident. However, healthcare system wide data collection initiatives are hampered by the proliferation of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and conflicting data collection standards. As part of a national initiative of the Dutch Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport we developed a consensus-based standard set of generic PROs and PROMs to be implemented across Dutch medical specialist care.

methodsA working group of mandated representatives of umbrella organizations involved in Dutch medical specialist care, together with PROM experts and patient organizations worked through a structured, consensus-driven co-creation process. This included literature reviews, online expert and working group meetings, and feedback from national patient- and umbrella organizations. The 'PROM-cycle' methodology was used to select feasible, valid, and reliable PROMs to obtain domain scores for each of the PROs included in the set.

resultsEight PROs across different domains of health were ultimately endorsed: symptoms (pain & fatigue), functioning (physical, social/participation, mental [anxiety & depression]), and overarching (quality of life & perceived overall health). A limited number of generic PROMs was endorsed. PROMIS short forms were selected as the preferred instruments for all PROs. Several recommendations were formulated to facilitate healthcare system level adoption and implementation of the standard set.

conclusionsWe developed a consensus-based standard set of Generic PROMs and a set of recommendations to facilitate healthcare system wide implementation across Dutch medical specialist care.

Indexed as

Patient CareQuality of LifeData CollectionDelivery of Health CareHumansPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresPatient reported outcome measures (PROMs)Patient reported outcomes (PROs)Quality improvementShared decision-making (SDM)Value-based health care (VBHC)

Identifiers

PMID36757571
PMCPMC10172289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.