ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2023
Outcomes following management of relapsed pediatric posterior fossa ependymoma in the molecular era.
Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Posterior fossa ependymoma: a comprehensive review of molecular classification, management guidelines, and clinical outcomes (Part I of ependymomas across compartments).Journal of neuro-oncology · 2026Review
- Recurrence patterns in pediatric intracranial ependymal neoplasm: a systematic imaging work-up.Neuroradiology · 2025Article
- Distinct relapse pattern across molecular ependymoma types.Neuro-oncology · 2025Article
- Review and update on pediatric ependymoma.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
12 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe overall survival and prognostic factors for children with multiply recurrent posterior fossa ependymoma are not well understood. We aimed to assess prognostic factors associated with survival for relapsed pediatric posterior fossa ependymoma.
methodsAn institutional database was queried for children with a primary diagnosis of posterior fossa ependymoma from 2000 to 2019. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox-proportional hazard regression were used to assess the relationship between treatment factors and overall survival.
resultsThere were 60 patients identified; molecular subtype was available for 56, of which 49 (87.5%) were PF-A and 7 (12.5%) were PF-B. Relapse occurred in 29 patients (48%) at a mean time of 24 months following primary resection. Median 50% survival was 12.3 years for all patients and 3.3 years following diagnosis of first relapsed disease. GTR was associated with significantly improved survival following primary resection (HR 0.373, 95% CI 0.14-0.96). Presence of recurrent disease was significantly associated with worse survival (p < 0.0001). At recurrent disease diagnosis, disseminated disease was a negative prognostic factor (HR 11.0 95% CI 2.7-44) while GTR at first relapse was associated with improved survival HR 0.215 (95% CI: 0.048-0.96, p = 0.044). Beyond first relapse, the impact of GTR was not significant on survival, though surgery compared to no surgery was favorable with HR 0.155 (95% CI: 0.04-0.59).
conclusionsDisseminated disease at recurrence and extent of resection for first relapsed disease were important prognostic factors. Surgery compared to no surgery was associated with improved survival for the multiply recurrent ependymoma cohort.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.