Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36757513›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2023

Von Mises stress peak (VMSP) and laryngomalacia severity score (LSS) are extremely useful in the selection of treatment for laryngomalacia.

Jiali Chen, Hongming Xu, Xiaoyan Li

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. A new classification scheme for laryngomalacia.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jiali Chen *Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Children's Hospital of Shanghai, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 355th Luding Road, Shanghai, 200062, People's Republic of China.
Hongming Xu *Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Children's Hospital of Shanghai, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 355th Luding Road, Shanghai, 200062, People's Republic of China.
Xiaoyan LiDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Children's Hospital of Shanghai, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 355th Luding Road, Shanghai, 200062, People's Republic of China. chhshent@126.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8874-5634
Shanghai Jiao Tong University · CN

Funding

the Clinical Research Project of Shanghai Shenkang Hospital Development Center No. 20873999the Foundation for Cross Biomedical Engineering of Shanghai Jiao Tong University No. YG2019QNB02the Youth Program of Shanghai Municipal Health Bureau No.20194Y0165
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo analyze the judgment efficiency of a computer stress model and severity score in severity evaluation and treatment plan selection of laryngomalacia patients.

methodsTwenty-two children (12 cases in the operation group and 10 cases in the follow-up group) with moderate to severe laryngomalacia were assessed by laryngomalacia severity score (LSS) which included visual analogue scale (VAS) and clinical score. A computer stress model of the laryngeal cavity was constructed for all children, with the von Mises stress peak (VMSP) of the model used as another quantitative evaluation method. The ROC curves of two quantitative evaluation methods, the LSS and the VMSP, were analyzed respectively, according to the clinical guideline which is regarded as the gold standard for judging whether surgery is needed. The diagnostic efficiency indexes such as sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were calculated. The area under ROC curves (AUC) of the two methods were compared by a DeLong model. Spearman correlation analysis and Kappa test were used to test the correlation and consistency of the two quantitative evaluation methods. The independent sample t test was used to compare the difference of LSS and VMSP between operation group and follow-up group.

resultsThe sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of LSS in judging whether laryngomalacia was operated or not were 83.33%, 80.00% and 81.82%, respectively, and the area under ROC curve (AUC) was 0.825 (p < 0.05). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the computer stress model for laryngomalacia were 58.33%, 90.00% and 72.73%, respectively, and the AUC was 0.796 (p < 0.05). The spearman correlation coefficient between LSS and VMSP was 0.833, p < 0.001, which is statistically significant. LSS (t = 3.251, p = 0.004) and VMSP (t = 2.435, p = 0.024) of the two groups were statistically different.

conclusionVMSP and LSS have high diagnostic efficacy in the quantitative evaluation of the severity of laryngomalacia and the selection of treatment plan. The consistency of the two quantitative evaluation methods is good, which has practical value for the evaluation of the severity of laryngomalacia and has guiding significance for surgery.

Indexed as

LaryngomalaciaLarynxChildComputer SimulationHumansPain MeasurementRetrospective StudiesROC CurveBiomechanicsLaryngomalaciaLaryngomalacia severity score (LSS)Von Mises stress peak (VMSP) of computer model

Identifiers

PMID36757513
OpenAlexW4319656501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.