ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2023
Comparison of lung ultrasound scores with clinical models for predicting bronchopulmonary dysplasia.
Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic accuracy of lung ultrasound score for bronchopulmonary dysplasia in preterm neonates: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Pooled it
- Comparison of different types of ultrasound probes for lung ultrasound in neonates-A prospective randomized comparison study.PloS one · 2024Trial
- Lung Ultrasound in Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia: Diagnostic Tool, Prognostic Marker or Monitoring Strategy?Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Serial lung ultrasound in predicting the need for surfactant and respiratory course in preterm infants-multicentre observational study (SLURP).European journal of pediatrics · 2025Observational
- Patent ductus arteriosus and the association between lung ultrasound score and bronchopulmonary dysplasia: a secondary analysis of a prospective study.European journal of pediatrics · 2024Article
- Diagnostic Accuracy of Lung Ultrasound in Neonatal Diseases: A Systematized Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Lung ultrasound scores (LUSs) have been demonstrated to accurately predict moderate-to-severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia (msBPD). This study attempted to explore the additional value of LUSs for predicting msBPD compared to clinical multivariate models in different gestational age (GA) groups. The study prospectively recruited preterm infants with GA < 32 weeks. Lung ultrasound was performed on days 3, 7, 14, and 21 after birth. A linear mixed-effects regression model was used to evaluate LUS evolution in infants born before and after 28 weeks. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) procedure was used to analyze the reliability of LUS and clinical multivariable models for predicting msBPD. The optimal time to predict msBPD in all infants was 7 days with a cut-off point of 5 (area under the ROC (AUROC) curve: 0.78, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.71-0.84). In infants with GA ≥ 28 weeks, LUSs provided a moderate diagnostic accuracy for all four time points (AUROC curve: 0.74-0.78), and the AUROC curve for the clinical multivariable model on day 14 was 0.91 (95% CI: 0.84-0.96), which was significantly higher than that of LUSs (AUROC curve: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.68-0.85, P < 0.05). In infants born at 23-27 weeks, LUSs showed a low diagnostic accuracy with higher cut-off points to predict msBPD, and the AUROC curve for GA to predict msBPD was 0.75 (95% CI: 0.59-0.85), providing diagnostic accuracy similar to that of LUSs. Conclusion: The contribution of LUSs to predict msBPD in infants with different GAs remains controversial and requires further investigation. What is Known: • Lung ultrasound scores (LUSs) have been demonstrated to accurately predict moderate-to-severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia in infants with gestational age (GA)<32 weeks. What is New: • The LUSs evolution differed between extremely preterm infants born before 28 weeks and preterm infants born at 28-32 weeks of gestation. • LUSs provided similar moderate predictive performance as GA-adjusted LUS and clinical multivariate models in infants born after 28 weeks, while LUSs seem to be less helpful in infants born before 28 weeks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.