Trial reportArchives of dermatological research2023
A randomized, open-label study to compare two different dosing regimens of oral tranexamic acid in treatment of moderate to severe facial melasma.
Trial report in Archives of dermatological research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Improved clinical efficacy of melasma with combination therapy of intense pulsed light and tranexamic acid: A retrospective analysis.Medicine · 2026Article
- Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Treatments on Melasma Area Severity Index and Quality of Life.Pharmaceutics · 2025Review
- Decrypting the Potential of Lipidic Vesicular System for Delivery Enhancement of Tranexamic Acid in Melasma Hyperpigmentation Treatment.Advanced pharmaceutical bulletin · 2025Review
- An Update on New and Existing Treatments for the Management of Melasma.American journal of clinical dermatology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Oral tranexamic acid (TXA) demonstrates promising results in melasma management. However, no clear consensus on the dosing and duration of maintenance doses of TXA therapy in melasma exists. In this study, we intend to evaluate and compare the efficacy of two different TXA dosing regimens in patients with melasma using the mMASI score. This was a randomized, open-label study wherein 50 patients (age > 18 years) with moderate to severe melasma were randomized into group A (250 mg TXA twice a day) and group B (500 mg TXA twice a day). Treatment was administered for 12 weeks and later followed up 4-weekly for next 12 weeks. The primary outcome measure was proportion of patients achieving 75% reduction in modified Melasma area and severity index (mMASI-75) at 12 weeks from baseline, reduction in mMASI and melasma quality of life (MelasQOL) score at 12 and 24 weeks. To assess the rate of relapse by end of 12 weeks post-treatment. Among 50 patients, proportion of patients achieving mMASI-75 at 12 weeks were 20% and 25% in group A and B, respectively (p-0.71). Both groups showed a significant reduction in mean mMASI (4.8 ± 2.2 in group A and 6.8 ± 3.4 in group B; p-0.02) at 12 weeks of treatment. mMASI remained stable after 12 weeks of follow-up and was 4.9 ± 2.43 and 4.93 ± 2.85 in group A and B, respectively (p-0.97). The mean percentage reduction in MelasQOL in group A and B were 41.8 ± 15.3 and 29.5 ± 21.5, respectively (p-0.03). No adverse effects were observed in both groups. Relapse rates was very less and comparable between both groups. Thus, we conclude that both dosing regimens showed comparable efficacy in terms of mMASI reduction at 12-weeks and the improvement achieved was well maintained even after 12-weeks of discontinuing treatment with very few patients relapsed. Hence, lower doses of TXA are equally effective and safe compared to higher doses and not all patients might require tapering or dosing maintenance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.