Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36756959›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of urology2023

Nadir Prostate-specific Antigen as an Independent Predictor of Survival Outcomes: A Post Hoc Analysis of the PROSPER Randomized Clinical Trial.

Maha Hussain, Cora N Sternberg, Eleni Efstathiou, Karim Fizazi, Qi Shen, Xun Lin, Jennifer Sugg, Joyce Steinberg, Bettina Noerby, Ugo De Giorgi and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of urology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Radiographic Progression With and Without Prostate-Specific Antigen Rise in Patients With Advanced Prostate Cancer Treated With Enzalutamide.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2026
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Microorganisms · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 10 institutions in 5 countries.

Maha HussainRobert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
Cora N SternbergEnglander Institute for Precision Medicine, Meyer Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
Eleni EfstathiouMD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Karim FizaziInstitut Gustave Roussy, University of Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France.
Qi ShenPfizer Inc., Collegeville, Pennsylvania.
Xun LinPfizer Inc., La Jolla, California.
Jennifer SuggAstellas Pharma, Inc., Northbrook, Illinois.
Joyce SteinbergAstellas Pharma, Inc., Northbrook, Illinois.
Bettina NoerbySygehus, Lillebaelt, Vejle, Denmark.
Ugo De GiorgiIRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) Dino Amadori, Meldola, Italy.
Neal D ShoreCarolina Urologic Research Center, Myrtle Beach, South Carolina.
Fred SaadUniversity of Montreal Hospital Center, Montreal, Canada.
Astellas Pharma (United States) · USPfizer (United States) · USCarolina Urologic Research Center · USCornell University · USIstituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori · ITLillebaelt Hospital · DKNorthwestern University · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversité de Montréal · CAUniversité Paris-Saclay · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis post hoc analysis of PROSPER evaluated the relationship between depth of PSA decline and clinical outcomes in enzalutamide-treated men with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND

methodsPROSPER was an international, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial that demonstrated significantly improved metastasis-free survival and overall survival with androgen deprivation therapy plus enzalutamide vs placebo. A total of 905 enzalutamide-treated men were included in this post hoc analysis. Metastasis-free survival (primary endpoint) and overall survival (secondary endpoint) were evaluated for 4 mutually exclusive subgroups defined by PSA decline: <50% (reference); ≥50% to <90%; ≥90%, nadir ≥0.2 ng/mL; and ≥90%, nadir <0.2 ng/mL. Medians and 95% confidence intervals were determined using a 12-month landmark analysis; hazard ratios and

resultsIn enzalutamide-treated men, PSA declines of <50%, ≥50% to <90%, ≥90% with nadir ≥0.2 ng/mL, and ≥90% with nadir <0.2 ng/mL were associated with median metastasis-free survival in months (95% confidence intervals) of 22.1 (14.8-not reached), 34.2 (29.4-not reached), 36.6 (33.4-not reached), and not reached, respectively, and overall survival in months (95% confidence intervals) of 40.8 (31.7-44.9), 54.4 (49.0-67.0), 64.3 (63.4-not reached), and not reached, respectively.

conclusionsThere was a statistically significant correlation between greater depth of PSA decline and improved clinical outcomes, suggesting a previously underappreciated relationship between changes in PSA levels and clinical outcomes in nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsProstate-Specific AntigenProstatic Neoplasms, Castration-ResistantAndrogen AntagonistsBenzamidesHumansMaleNitrilesPhenylthiohydantoinTreatment OutcomeAndrogen AntagonistsAntineoplastic AgentsBenzamidesenzalutamideNitrilesPhenylthiohydantoinProstate-Specific Antigenclinical trialenzalutamideprostate-specific antigenprostatic neoplasmssurvival analysis

Identifiers

PMID36756959
PMCPMC12721655
OpenAlexW4319656461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.