Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36756638›Full record

ArticleOxford open materials science2022

Generating 3D architectured nature-inspired materials and granular media using diffusion models based on language cues.

Markus J Buehler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oxford open materials science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. What Does DALL-E 2 Know About Radiology?Journal of medical Internet research · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Markus J BuehlerLaboratory for Atomistic and Molecular Mechanics (LAMM), Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4173-9659

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A variety of image generation methods have emerged in recent years, notably DALL-E 2, Imagen and Stable Diffusion. While they have been shown to be capable of producing photorealistic images from text prompts facilitated by generative diffusion models conditioned on language input, their capacity for materials design has not yet been explored. Here, we use a trained Stable Diffusion model and consider it as an experimental system, examining its capacity to generate novel material designs especially in the context of 3D material architectures. We demonstrate that this approach offers a paradigm to generate diverse material patterns and designs, using human-readable language as input, allowing us to explore a vast nature-inspired design portfolio for both novel architectured materials and granular media. We present a series of methods to translate 2D representations into 3D data, including movements through noise spaces via mixtures of text prompts, and image conditioning. We create physical samples using additive manufacturing and assess material properties of materials designed via a coarse-grained particle simulation approach. We present case studies using images as starting point for material generation; exemplified in two applications. First, a design for which we use Haeckel's classic lithographic print of a diatom, which we amalgamate with a spider web. Second, a design that is based on the image of a flame, amalgamating it with a hybrid of a spider web and wood structures. These design approaches result in complex materials forming solids or granular liquid-like media that can ultimately be tuned to meet target demands.

Indexed as

architected materialhierarchical bio-inspiredlanguage modelsmaterials designsynthesis

Identifiers

PMID36756638
PMCPMC9767007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.