Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36756637›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2022

Daily living skills scale: Development and preliminary validation of a new, open-source assessment of daily living skills.

Mirko Uljarević, Emily K Spackman, Ru Ying Cai, Katherine J Paszek, Antonio Y Hardan, Thomas W Frazier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Turkish Validity and Reliability Study of the Executive Functioning Scale and the Daily Living Skills Scale in Children and Adolescents.International journal of developmental neuroscience : the official journal of the International Society for Developmental Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mirko UljarevićDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.
Emily K SpackmanSchool of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Ru Ying CaiAspect Research Centre for Autism Practice, French's Forest, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Katherine J PaszekDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.
Antonio Y HardanDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.
Thomas W FrazierDepartment of Psychology, John Carroll University, University Heights, OH, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Autistic individuals and individuals with a range of other neurodevelopmental conditions (NDD) often present with lower levels of daily living skills (DLS) when compared to their neurotypical peers. Importantly, lower levels of DLS have been linked to a range of negative outcomes, including lower rates of post-secondary education, lower employment rates, and higher daily support needs across autism and NDD. However, there are currently no open-source informant-reported instruments for capturing key aspects of DLS. This study describes the development, refinement, and initial psychometric evaluation of a new, relatively brief (53-item). Daily Living Skills Scale (DLSS) in a sample of 1,361 children aged 2-17 years, Confirmatory Factor Analysis demonstrated an excellent fit of unidimensional model to the data (CFI = 0.953, TLI = 0.951, RMSEA = 0.073 [95% CI: 0.071-0.074]). The single-factor CFA model showed evidence of measurement invariance of factor loadings, thresholds, and residual variance (strict invariance) across sex, age, race, and ethnicity. Model reliability and internal consistency were excellent (ω = 0.98; α = 0.97). Conditional reliability estimates indicated very good reliability (= 0.80) for the total DLS scale from very low (θ = -4.2) to high (θ = +2.4) scores. Conceptually derived self-care, homecare, and community participation subscales also showed strong reliability and internal consistency. With further replication, the EFS has excellent potential for wide adoption across research and clinical contexts.

Indexed as

adaptive functioningassessmentautismdaily living skillsneurodevelopmentalneuropsychiatric

Identifiers

PMID36756637
PMCPMC9900738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.