ArticleNanoscale advances2023
Comparison of the efficacy of seven types of microneedles for treating a rabbit hypertrophic scar model.
Article in Nanoscale advances, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Photothermally Amplified Enzyme-Nitric Oxide Co-Regulatory System Reprograms Pathological ECM-Fibroblast Crosstalk to Alleviate Hypertrophic Scarring.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Epigenetic orchestration of scar formation: Therapeutic potential of targeting DNA methylation and non‑coding RNAs in cutaneous fibrosis (Review).Molecular medicine reports · 2026Review
- Advances in microneedle design for the delivery of drugs, proteins, and cells in the treatment of hypertrophic scars.Burns & trauma · 2026Review
- Leveraging Microneedles for Raised Scar Management.Polymers · 2025Review
- Current trends in textile wastewater treatment-bibliometric review.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2024Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microneedle technology can effectively suppress the formation of hypertrophic scarring in both animals and humans. Our previous research has revealed that this is due to the physical contact inhibition effect by using microneedles made of liquid-crystal polymers as the model device. One important factor we didn't study is the influence of the fabrication materials of microneedles. Therefore, this article examines this key point on a rabbit ear hypertrophic scar model. We monitor the thickness of the scars, and the expression of α-SMA and Ki-67 protein, and TGF-β1 mRNA in a period of 42 days. Among microneedles made of 6 polymeric materials and stainless steel, polymethylmethacrylate microneedles present superiority in all aspects including the reduction of tissue fibrosis, and the expression of α-SMA, Ki-67 protein and TGF-β1 mRNA. On the other hand, polycarbonates, polyurethane, and polylactic-
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.