Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36756318›Full record

ArticleChemical science2023

Modelling amorphous materials

Angela F Harper, Steffen P Emge, Pieter C M M Magusin, Clare P Grey, Andrew J Morris

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemical science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Rapid Acquisition ofJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Angela F HarperTheory of Condensed Matter, Cavendish Laboratory, University of Cambridge J. J. Thomson Avenue Cambridge CB3 0HE UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0699-0450
Steffen P EmgeYusuf Hamied Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge Lensfield Road Cambridge CB2 1EW UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8613-9465
Pieter C M M MagusinYusuf Hamied Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge Lensfield Road Cambridge CB2 1EW UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1167-3764
Clare P GreyYusuf Hamied Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge Lensfield Road Cambridge CB2 1EW UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5572-192X
Andrew J MorrisSchool of Metallurgy and Materials, University of Birmingham Edgbaston Birmingham B15 2TT UK a.j.morris.1@bham.ac.uk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7453-5698

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding a material's electronic structure is crucial to the development of many functional devices from semiconductors to solar cells and Li-ion batteries. A material's properties, including electronic structure, are dependent on the arrangement of its atoms. However, structure determination (the process of uncovering the atomic arrangement), is impeded, both experimentally and computationally, by disorder. The lack of a verifiable atomic model presents a huge challenge when designing functional amorphous materials. Such materials may be characterised through their local atomic environments using, for example, solid-state NMR and XAS. By using these two spectroscopy methods to inform the sampling of configurations from

Identifiers

PMID36756318
PMCPMC9891381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.