Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36756249›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2023

Tenecteplase vs. alteplase for treatment of acute ischemic stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Hassan Kobeissi, Sherief Ghozy, Bilal Turfe, Cem Bilgin, Ramanathan Kadirvel, David F Kallmes, Waleed Brinjikji, Alejandro A Rabinstein

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Rapid recommendations: Updates from 2023 guidelines: part 1.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2024
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Grand challenges in pediatric stroke.Frontiers in stroke · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Hassan KobeissiDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.
Sherief GhozyDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.
Bilal TurfeSchool of Medicine, Ross University, Bridgetown, Barbados.
Cem BilginDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.
Ramanathan KadirvelDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.
David F KallmesDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.
Waleed BrinjikjiDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.
Alejandro A RabinsteinDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.
Mayo Clinic in Arizona · USRoss University School of Medicine · BBWinnMed · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and objectives: Several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have compared tenecteplase to alteplase for treatment of acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Yet, there is no meta-analysis that includes the latest published RCTs of 2022. We sought to compare the safety and efficacy of tenecteplase vs. alteplase for the treatment of AIS through a meta-analysis of all published RCTs. Methods: A systematic literature review of the English language literature was conducted using PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Embase. We included RCTs that focused on patients with AIS treated with tenecteplase and alteplase. Multiple reviewers screened through potential studies to identify the final papers included in our analysis. Following PRISMA guidelines, multiple authors extracted data to ensure accuracy. Data were pooled using a random-effects model. Results: Nine trials, with 3,706 patients, compared outcomes of patients treated with tenecteplase and alteplase for AIS. Both treatments resulted in comparable rates of modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0-1 at 90 days (RR = 1.03; 95% CI = 0.97-1.10; Discussion: Based on available evidence from completed RCTs, tenecteplase has proven similar safety and efficacy to alteplase for treatment of AIS.

Indexed as

alteplaseischemic strokemeta-analysisstroketenecteplaseTNKTPA

Identifiers

PMID36756249
PMCPMC9900099
OpenAlexW4317721799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.