Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36756208›Full record

ArticleMaterials today. Bio2023

Engineering exosomes by three-dimensional porous scaffold culture of human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells promote osteochondral repair.

Zineng Yan, Han Yin, Jiang Wu, Guangzhao Tian, Muzhe Li, Zhiyao Liao, Songlin He, Haoyuan Deng, Chao Ning, Zhengang Ding and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials today. Bio, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Zineng YanGuizhou Medical University, Guiyang, 550004, Guizhou, China.
Han YinInstitute of Orthopedics, Chinese PLA General Hospital; Beijing Key Laboratory of Regenerative Medicine in Orthopedics; Key Laboratory of Musculoskeletal Trauma & War Injuries PLA; No. 28 Fuxing Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100853, China.
Jiang WuGuizhou Medical University, Guiyang, 550004, Guizhou, China.
Guangzhao TianInstitute of Orthopedics, Chinese PLA General Hospital; Beijing Key Laboratory of Regenerative Medicine in Orthopedics; Key Laboratory of Musculoskeletal Trauma & War Injuries PLA; No. 28 Fuxing Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100853, China.
Muzhe LiInstitute of Orthopedics, Chinese PLA General Hospital; Beijing Key Laboratory of Regenerative Medicine in Orthopedics; Key Laboratory of Musculoskeletal Trauma & War Injuries PLA; No. 28 Fuxing Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100853, China.
Zhiyao LiaoInstitute of Orthopedics, Chinese PLA General Hospital; Beijing Key Laboratory of Regenerative Medicine in Orthopedics; Key Laboratory of Musculoskeletal Trauma & War Injuries PLA; No. 28 Fuxing Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100853, China.
Songlin HeInstitute of Orthopedics, Chinese PLA General Hospital; Beijing Key Laboratory of Regenerative Medicine in Orthopedics; Key Laboratory of Musculoskeletal Trauma & War Injuries PLA; No. 28 Fuxing Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100853, China.
Haoyuan DengInstitute of Orthopedics, Chinese PLA General Hospital; Beijing Key Laboratory of Regenerative Medicine in Orthopedics; Key Laboratory of Musculoskeletal Trauma & War Injuries PLA; No. 28 Fuxing Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100853, China.
Chao NingInstitute of Orthopedics, Chinese PLA General Hospital; Beijing Key Laboratory of Regenerative Medicine in Orthopedics; Key Laboratory of Musculoskeletal Trauma & War Injuries PLA; No. 28 Fuxing Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100853, China.
Zhengang DingGuizhou Medical University, Guiyang, 550004, Guizhou, China.
Xun YuanGuizhou Medical University, Guiyang, 550004, Guizhou, China.
Xiang SuiInstitute of Orthopedics, Chinese PLA General Hospital; Beijing Key Laboratory of Regenerative Medicine in Orthopedics; Key Laboratory of Musculoskeletal Trauma & War Injuries PLA; No. 28 Fuxing Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100853, China.
Mingxue ChenDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Peking University Fourth School of Clinical Medicine, No. 31 Xinjiekou East Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100035, China.
Shuyun LiuInstitute of Orthopedics, Chinese PLA General Hospital; Beijing Key Laboratory of Regenerative Medicine in Orthopedics; Key Laboratory of Musculoskeletal Trauma & War Injuries PLA; No. 28 Fuxing Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100853, China.
Quanyi GuoInstitute of Orthopedics, Chinese PLA General Hospital; Beijing Key Laboratory of Regenerative Medicine in Orthopedics; Key Laboratory of Musculoskeletal Trauma & War Injuries PLA; No. 28 Fuxing Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100853, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Improving the poor microenvironment in the joint cavity has potential for treating cartilage injury, and mesenchymal stem cell (MSC)-derived exosomes (MSC-Exos), which can modulate cellular behavior, are becoming a new cell-free therapy for cartilage repair. Here, we used acellular cartilage extracellular matrix (ACECM) to prepare 3D scaffolds and 2D substrates by low-temperature deposition modeling (LDM) and tape casting. We aimed to investigate whether MSC-Exos cultured on scaffolds of different dimensions could improve the poor joint cavity microenvironment caused by cartilage injury and to explore the related mechanisms. In vitro experiments showed that exosomes derived from MSCs cultured on three-dimensional (3D) scaffolds (3D-Exos) had increased efficiency. In short-term animal experiments, compared with exosomes derived from MSCs cultured in a two-dimensional (2D) environment (2D-Exos), 3D-Exos had a stronger ability to regulate the joint cavity microenvironment. Long-term animal studies confirmed the therapeutic efficacy of 3D-Exos over 2D-Exos. Thus, 3D-Exos were applied in the rat knee osteochondral defect model after adsorption in the micropores of the scaffold and combined with subsequent articular cavity injections, and they showed a stronger cartilage repair ability. These findings provide a new strategy for repairing articular cartilage damage. Furthermore, miRNA sequencing indicated that the function of 3D-Exos may be associated with high expression of miRNAs. Thus, our study provides valuable insights for the design of 3D-Exos to promote cartilage regeneration.

Indexed as

Cartilage repairExosomesmiRNAThree-dimensional scaffold culture

Identifiers

PMID36756208
PMCPMC9900437

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.