Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36756162›Full record

ArticleComputational intelligence and neuroscience2023

Improved UNet Deep Learning Model for Automatic Detection of Lung Cancer Nodules.

Vinay Kumar, Baraa Riyadh Altahan, Tariq Rasheed, Prabhdeep Singh, Devpriya Soni, Hashem O Alsaab, Fardin Ahmadi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Vinay KumarDepartment of Computer Science, Dyal Singh Evening College (University of Delhi), Delhi 110003, India.
Baraa Riyadh AltahanDepartment of Medical Instrumentation Techniques Engineering, Al-Mustaqbal University College, Hilla, Babylon, Iraq.
Tariq RasheedDepartment of English, College of Science and Humanities, Al-Kharj Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj 11942, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2613-1124
Prabhdeep SinghDepartment of Computer Science & Engineering, Graphic Era Deemed to be University, Dehradun 248002, Uttarakhand, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7632-2271
Devpriya SoniAssociate professor Department of Computer Science & Engineering and Information Technology, Jaypee Institute of Information Technology, Noida, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5589-5962
Hashem O AlsaabDepartment of Pharmaceutics and Pharmaceutical Technology, Taif University, P.O. Box 11099, Taif 21944, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5448-1004
Fardin AhmadiComputer Science Faculty, University Rana University, Kabul, Afghanistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9122-1711

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Uncontrolled cell growth in the two spongy lung organs in the chest is the most prevalent kind of cancer. When cells from the lungs spread to other tissues and organs, this is referred to as metastasis. This work uses image processing, deep learning, and metaheuristics to identify cancer in its early stages. At this point, a new convolutional neural network is constructed. The predator technique has the potential to increase network architecture and accuracy. Deep learning identified lung cancer spinal metastases in as energy consumption increased CT readings for lung cancer bone metastases decreased. Qualified physicians, on the other hand, discovered 71.14 and 74.60 percent of targets with energies of 140 and 60 keV, respectively, whereas the proposed model gives 76.51 and 81.58 percent, respectively. Expert physicians' detection rate was 74.60 percent lower than deep learning's detection rate of 81.58 percent. The proposed method has the highest accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity (93.4, 98.4, and 97.1 percent, respectively), as well as the lowest error rate (1.6 percent). Finally, in lung segmentation, the proposed model outperforms the CNN model. High-intensity energy-spectral CT images are more difficult to segment than low-intensity energy-spectral CT images.

Indexed as

Deep LearningLung NeoplasmsHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedLungNeural Networks, ComputerTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID36756162
PMCPMC9902147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.