Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36756156›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in oncology2023

Cancel cancer: The immunotherapeutic potential of CD200/CD200R blockade.

Deborah Choe, Dongwon Choi

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Deborah ChoeDepartment of Surgery, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine of USC, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Dongwon ChoiDepartment of Surgery, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine of USC, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
University of Southern California · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immune checkpoint molecules function to inhibit and regulate immune response pathways to prevent hyperactive immune activity from damaging healthy tissues. In cancer patients, targeting these key molecules may serve as a valuable therapeutic mechanism to bolster immune function and restore the body's natural defenses against tumors. CD200, an immune checkpoint molecule, is a surface glycoprotein that is widely but not ubiquitously expressed throughout the body. By interacting with its inhibitory receptor CD200R, CD200 suppresses immune cell activity within the tumor microenvironment, creating conditions that foster tumor growth. Targeting the CD200/CD200R pathway, either through the use of monoclonal antibodies or peptide inhibitors, has shown to be effective in boosting anti-tumor immune activity. This review will explore CD200 and the protein's expression and role within the tumor microenvironment, blood endothelial cells, and lymph nodes. This paper will also discuss the advantages and challenges of current strategies used to target CD200 and briefly summarize relevant preclinical/clinical studies investigating the immunotherapeutic efficacy of CD200/CD200R blockade.

Indexed as

CD200CD200Rimmune-checkpointimmunotherapylymphaticstumor microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID36756156
PMCPMC9900175
OpenAlexW4317728424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.