Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36756148›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medical technology2022

Systems and processes for regulation of investigational medical devices in Uganda.

Charles Norman Mpaata, Brian Matovu, Mercy Takuwa, Noah Kiwanuka, Steff Lewis, John Norrie, Sam Ononge, Sharon Tuck, Maria Wolters, Marc Demulliez and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medical technology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Charles Norman MpaataBiomedical Engineering Unit, Department of Physiology, School of Biomedical Sciences College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Brian MatovuBiomedical Engineering Unit, Department of Physiology, School of Biomedical Sciences College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Mercy TakuwaBiomedical Engineering Unit, Department of Physiology, School of Biomedical Sciences College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Noah KiwanukaClinical Trials Unit, School of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Steff LewisUsher Institute, Edinburgh Medical School, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
John NorrieUsher Institute, Edinburgh Medical School, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Sam OnongeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Sharon TuckUsher Institute, Edinburgh Medical School, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Maria WoltersInformatics Forum, School of Informatics, College of Science and Engineering, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Marc DemulliezSchool of Engineering & Physical Sciences, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Robert T SsekitolekoBiomedical Engineering Unit, Department of Physiology, School of Biomedical Sciences College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Makerere University · UGUniversity of Edinburgh · GBEdinburgh College · GBHeriot-Watt University · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/T03937X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In many parts of the world, medical devices and the processes of their development are tightly regulated. However, the current regulatory landscape in Uganda like other developing countries is weak and poorly defined, which creates significant barriers to innovation, clinical evaluation, and translation of medical devices. Aim: To evaluate current knowledge, systems and infrastructure for medical devices regulation and innovation in Uganda. Methods: A mixed methods study design using the methods triangulation strategy was employed in this study. Data of equal weight were collected sequentially. First, a digital structured questionnaire was sent out to innovators to establish individual knowledge and experience with medical device innovation and regulation. Then, a single focus group discussion involving both medical device innovators and regulators to collect data about the current regulatory practices for medical devices in Uganda. Univariate and bivariate analysis was done for the quantitative data to summarize results in graphs and tables. Qualitative data was analyzed using thematic analysis. Ethical review and approval were obtained from the Makerere University School of Biomedical Sciences, Research and Ethics Committee, and the Uganda National Council for Science and Technology. Results: A total of 47 innovators responded to the questionnaire. 14 respondents were excluded since they were not medical device innovators. Majority (76%) of individuals had been innovators for more than a year, held a bachelor's degree with a background in Engineering and applied sciences, and worked in an academic research institute. 22 of the 33 medical device innovators had stopped working on their innovations and had stalled at the proof-of-concept stage. Insufficient funding, inadequate technical expertise and confusing regulatory landscape were major challenges to innovation. The two themes that emerged from the discussion were "developing standards for medical devices regulation" and "implementation of regulations in practical processes". Legal limitations, lengthy processes, and low demand were identified as challenges to developing medical device regulations. Conclusions: Efforts have been taken by government to create a pathway for medical device innovations to be translated to the market. More work needs to be done to coordinate efforts among stakeholders to build effective medical device regulations in Uganda.

Indexed as

clinical evaluationmedical devicesmedical devices regulationsmedical device standardsmedical innovationregulatory pathway

Identifiers

PMID36756148
PMCPMC9899893
OpenAlexW4317717550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.