Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36756079›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and translational science2022

Getting started in jail, prison, and legal system research.

Jason Glenn, Joi Wickliffe, Patricia J Kelly

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and translational science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jason GlennUniversity of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.
Joi WickliffeUniversity of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0856-6597
Patricia J KellyJefferson College of Nursing, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8143-7153

Funding

Correctional and Public Health Links to Bolster HPV Vaccine and Cancer PreventionR21CA204767 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI RAMASWAMY, MEGHA · 2016 to 2017
$377k
NCI NIH HHS R21 CA204767
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extensive health inequities exist for persons with criminal-legal involvement in the USA. Researchers, both novice and experienced, are critical in documenting these inequities and implementing programs that address the many health and social problems of this population. However, working with currently or formerly incarcerated persons brings new challenges to researchers that may have not been previously considered as necessary. Because incarcerated persons were systemically exploited by biomedical researchers until reform following the Civil Rights Movement, resulting in their designation as a vulnerable population in the Code of Federal Regulations, enhanced protections are necessary in implementing contemporary research involving incarcerated persons. These enhanced protections can delay or prolong the regulatory approval process, particularly to the novice carceral system researcher, which may discourage some from engaging with this important population. Drawing on the many years of experience working with incarcerated persons accumulated by the Sexual Health Empowerment (S)HE Team at the University of Kansas Medical Center (KUMC), this article offers some concrete steps toward getting started in this work.

Indexed as

health inequitiesmass incarcerationPrison/jailresearch

Identifiers

PMID36756079
PMCPMC9879861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.