ArticleDegenerative neurological and neuromuscular disease2023
Neuroimaging Correlates of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Multiple Sclerosis.
Article in Degenerative neurological and neuromuscular disease, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Informing development of brain cancer therapies within "preclinical trials" using ex vivo patient tumors.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2026Review
- From checkboxes to emojis: a novel approach to patient-reported outcomes in multiple sclerosis.Journal of neurology · 2025Article
- Impact of Cognitive Impairment on Quality of Life in Multiple Sclerosis Patients-A Comprehensive Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are increasingly associated with concurrent and future impairments in persons with multiple sclerosis (pwMS). The structural and pathological relationships with PROs in pwMS have not been elucidated. Methods: One hundred and forty-two pwMS and 47 healthy controls (HCs) were scanned using 3T MRI and completed a PRO questionnaire named Lifeware Results: When compared to HCs, pwMS reported significantly greater limitations in mobility domains, including standing up from low seat (p < 0.001), climbing flight of stairs (p < 0.001), lower limb limitation (p < 0.001), limitations in bladder continence (p = 0.001) and fatigability (p < 0.001). Patient-reported limitations related to lower extremity function were explained by age, BDI, and all DGM nuclei volumes (p < 0.029). No such relationships were seen in the HCs. Fatiguability and the extent of life satisfaction were only related to depression (BDI p < 0.001) and not associated with any MRI-based outcomes. Most relationships between structural pathology and PROs were mediated by BDI scores (p < 0.001). In the pwMS group, there were no significant differences in any MRI-based brain volumes between the levels of reported life satisfaction. Conclusion: PRO measures of lower extremity limitations were associated with DGM structures and DGM-specific nuclei. These findings promote the relevance of measuring DGM structures as measures directly related to subjective well-being and walking limitations. Depression is a significant mediator of PROs and in particular of life satisfaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.