ReviewTherapeutic advances in infectious disease
Promoting health equity in HIV prevention and treatment research: a practical guide to establishing, implementing, and sustaining community advisory boards.
Review in Therapeutic advances in infectious disease. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed.
- Determining Ethical Incentives in Biomedical HIV Research: Insights from Researchers, Regulators, and People Living with HIV.Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE · 2026Article
- "Because we're the experts": centering the expertise of people who use drugs to identify and propose solutions for overdose prevention.Harm reduction journal · 2025Article
- Community advisory boards to inform behavioural health research in primary care: protocol for a scoping review.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Engaging people with lived experience on community advisory boards in community-based participatory research: a scoping review.International journal for equity in health · 2025Article
- Community-Based Participatory Research with Sexual and Gender Minority Trauma Survivors: Challenges, Solutions, and Recommendations for Future Research.Journal of interpersonal violence · 2025Article
- The HIV Anxiety Scale (HAS): Developing and Validating a Measure of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Anxiety.AIDS and behavior · 2025Article
- Article
- Enhancing HIV Prevention Efforts in the Criminal Legal System: A Comprehensive Review and Recommendations.Current HIV/AIDS reports · 2025Review
- CENTER-ing Black voices: incorporating lived experience across the research process to advance equity in drug treatment and outcomes.Harm reduction journal · 2025Article
- A Qualitative Study Exploring How the Perspectives and Experiences of Cisgender Black Women Inform Their Readiness to Consider Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis for HIV Prevention.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
- Peer-Led Adjunctive Interventions for Increasing the Reach of HIV Prevention and Care Interventions to Latino/x/e Men Who Have Sex with Men: a Scoping Review.Current HIV/AIDS reports · 2025Article
- Collaborating with and enabling diverse communities to address health inequities: The experiences of a community engagement and outreach team.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- Establishing a peer advisory board in a mental health ethics research group - challenges, benefits, facilitators and lessons learned.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
- Barriers and Facilitators to the Recruitment and Engagement of Diverse Populations Into Patient and Family Advisory Councils: A Scoping Review.Journal of patient experience · 2025Article
- Strategies for Presenting Research to Community Advisory Boards: Practical Tips from an HIV-focused CAB.Progress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action · 2025Article
- Unlocking success: community engagement for enhanced HIV care outcomes.Research involvement and engagement · 2024Article
- A community-academic partnered approach to designing a Virtual Village to address the needs of older adults living with HIV.AIDS care · 2024Article
- Social Network Characteristics Associated with More Frequent HIV and STI Prevention Conversations: The N2 Cohort Study in Chicago.AIDS and behavior · 2024Article
- Longitudinal predictors of post-exposure prophylaxis awareness among latino sexual minority men in South Florida.Journal of behavioral medicine · 2024Article
- Factors associated with meningitis vaccine awareness and engagement among Latino men who have sex with men in South Florida.Journal of behavioral medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Over the last 25 years, community-based participatory research (CBPR) has emerged as an innovative methodological approach to break down the barriers toward health equity in biopsychosocial research. Although there are several methods one can use to conduct CBPR research, one widely used established tool that has shown to be effective for engaging community meaningfully in research is community advisory boards (CABs). CABs are formalized collaborative bodies consisting of community and research stakeholders and have been integral in engaging underserved groups experiencing HIV-related health inequities at the early stages of the AIDS crisis. Even though evidence suggests that CABs are an effective tool for conducting high-quality, rigorous, and community-centered HIV-related research, there are minimal guidelines summarizing the steps needed for developing and maintaining a CAB. Therefore, to fill this gap in the literature, this article offers a practical guide to help researchers with minimal experience, particularly graduate students and early-stage investigators, feel more comfortable with establishing a CAB for equity-focused HIV-related research. This article synthesizes already established guidelines and frameworks for CAB development while specifically outlining unique steps related to the three main stages of CAB formation - establishment, implementation, and sustainment. Throughout this article, the authors offer tension points, generated from the literature and with consultation from a CAB working alongside the authors, that researchers and community partners may need to navigate during each of these three stages. In addition, best practices from the literature are identified for each step in the guidelines so that readers can see firsthand how research groups have carried out these steps in their own practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.