Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36755965›Full record

ArticleERJ open research2023

Development and validation of a predictive model combining patient-reported outcome measures, spirometry and exhaled nitric oxide fraction for asthma diagnosis.

Gilles Louis, Florence Schleich, Michèle Guillaume, Delphine Kirkove, Halehsadat Nekoee Zahrei, Anne-Françoise Donneau, Monique Henket, Virginie Paulus, Françoise Guissard, Renaud Louis and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ERJ open research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Update on the Role of FeNO in Asthma Management.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Gilles LouisDepartment of Public Health, University of Liège, Liege, Belgium.
Florence SchleichDepartment of Pneumology, GIGAI3, University of Liège, Liege, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2678-1373
Michèle GuillaumeDepartment of Public Health, University of Liège, Liege, Belgium.
Delphine KirkoveDepartment of Public Health, University of Liège, Liege, Belgium.
Halehsadat Nekoee ZahreiDepartment of Public Health, Biostatistics Unit, University of Liège, Liege, Belgium.
Anne-Françoise DonneauDepartment of Public Health, Biostatistics Unit, University of Liège, Liege, Belgium.
Monique HenketDepartment of Pneumology, GIGAI3, University of Liège, Liege, Belgium.
Virginie PaulusDepartment of Pneumology, GIGAI3, University of Liège, Liege, Belgium.
Françoise GuissardDepartment of Pneumology, GIGAI3, University of Liège, Liege, Belgium.
Renaud LouisDepartment of Pneumology, GIGAI3, University of Liège, Liege, Belgium.
Benoit PétréDepartment of Public Health, University of Liège, Liege, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Although asthma is a common disease, its diagnosis remains a challenge in clinical practice with both over- and underdiagnosis. Here, we performed a prospective observational study investigating the value of symptom intensity scales alone or combined with spirometry and exhaled nitric oxide fraction ( Methods: Over a 38-month period we recruited 303 untreated patients complaining of symptoms suggestive of asthma (wheezing, dyspnoea, cough, sputum production and chest tightness). The whole cohort was split into a training cohort (n=166) for patients recruited during odd months and a validation cohort (n=137) for patients recruited during even months. Asthma was diagnosed either by a positive reversibility test (≥12% and ≥200 mL in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV Results: 63% of patients in the derivation cohort and 58% of patients in the validation cohort were diagnosed as being asthmatic. After logistic regression, wheezing was the only symptom to be significantly associated with asthma. Similarly, FEV Conclusion: Combining a wheezing intensity scale with spirometry and

Identifiers

PMID36755965
PMCPMC9900444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.