Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36755872›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2023

Hidden impacts of conservation management on fertility of the critically endangered kākāpō.

Andrew Digby, Daryl Eason, Alejandro Catalina, Michael Lierz, Stephanie Galla, Lara Urban, Marissa F Le Lec, Joseph Guhlin, Tammy E Steeves, Peter K Dearden and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Andrew DigbyKākāpō Recovery Programme, Department of Conservation, Invercargill, New Zealand.
Daryl EasonKākāpō Recovery Programme, Department of Conservation, Invercargill, New Zealand.
Alejandro CatalinaDepartment of Computer Science, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland.
Michael LierzClinic for Birds, Reptiles, Amphibians and Fish, Justus-Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Germany.
Stephanie GallaSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Lara UrbanGenomics Aotearoa, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Marissa F Le LecGenomics Aotearoa, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Joseph GuhlinGenomics Aotearoa, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Tammy E SteevesSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Peter K DeardenGenomics Aotearoa, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Tineke JoustraUnaffiliated, Auckland, New Zealand.
Caroline LeesIUCN SSC Conservation Planning Specialist Group, Auckland, New Zealand.
Tane DavisTe Rūnanga o Ngāi Tahu, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Deidre VercoeKākāpō Recovery Programme, Department of Conservation, Invercargill, New Zealand.
Kākāpō Recovery Team
University of Otago · NZUniversity of Canterbury · NZAalto University · FITe Whare Wānanga o Awanuiārangi · NZUniversity of Giessen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Animal conservation often requires intensive management actions to improve reproductive output, yet any adverse effects of these may not be immediately apparent, particularly in threatened species with small populations and long lifespans. Hand-rearing is an example of a conservation management strategy which, while boosting populations, can cause long-term demographic and behavioural problems. It is used in the recovery of the critically endangered kākāpō ( Methods: We applied Bayesian mixed models to examine whether hand-rearing and other factors were associated with clutch fertility in kākāpō. We used projection predictive variable selection to compare the relative contributions to fertility from the parents' rearing environment, their age and previous copulation experience, the parental kinship, and the number of mates and copulations for each clutch. We also explored how the incidence of repeated copulations and multiple mates varied with kākāpō density. Results: The rearing status of the clutch father and the number of mates and copulations of the clutch mother were the dominant factors in predicting fertility. Clutches were less likely to be fertile if the father was hand-reared compared to wild-reared, but there was no similar effect for mothers. Clutches produced by females copulating with different males were more likely to be fertile than those from repeated copulations with one male, which in turn had a higher probability of fertility than those from a single copulation. The likelihood of multiple copulations and mates increased with female:male adult sex ratio, perhaps as a result of mate guarding by females. Parental kinship, copulation experience and age all had negligible associations with clutch fertility. Conclusions: These results provide a rare assessment of factors affecting fertility in a wild threatened bird species, with implications for conservation management. The increased fertility due to multiple mates and copulations, combined with the evidence for mate guarding and previous results of kākāpō sperm morphology, suggests that an evolutionary mechanism exists to optimise fertility through sperm competition in kākāpō. The high frequency of clutches produced from single copulations in the contemporary population may therefore represent an unnatural state, perhaps due to too few females. This suggests that opportunity for sperm competition should be maximised by increasing population densities, optimising sex ratios, and using artificial insemination. The lower fertility of hand-reared males may result from behavioural defects due to lack of exposure to conspecifics at critical development stages, as seen in other taxa. This potential negative impact of hand-rearing must be balanced against the short-term benefits it provides.

Indexed as

ParrotsSemenAnimalsBayes TheoremEndangered SpeciesFemaleFertilityMaleReproductionAnimal behaviourConservation biologyConservation managementFertilityGeneticsKākāpōReproduction

Identifiers

PMID36755872
PMCPMC9901309
OpenAlexW4319083428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.