ArticleFrontiers in sociology2022
AI revolution in healthcare and medicine and the (re-)emergence of inequalities and disadvantages for ageing population.
Article in Frontiers in sociology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Framework for bias evaluation in large language models in healthcare settings.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Algorithmic bias in public health AI: a silent threat to equity in low-resource settings.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- The future of multimorbidity management in the older adults: transforming AI-enabled precision medicine.Frontiers in public health · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence, complexity, and systemic resilience in global governance.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Review
- Medication Management in Portuguese Long-Term Care Facilities: A Preliminary Cross-Sectional Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- AI-Assisted Decision-Making in Long-Term Care: Qualitative Study on Prerequisites for Responsible Innovation.JMIR nursing · 2024Article
- Beyond the stereotypes: Artificial Intelligence image generation and diversity in anesthesiology.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2024Article
- Use of Electronic Medical Records (EMR) in Gerontology: Benefits, Considerations and a Promising Future.Clinical interventions in aging · 2023Review
- Perceptions, barriers, and risk of artificial intelligence Among healthcare professionals: A cross-sectional study.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
AI systems in medicine and healthcare are being extensively explored in prevention, diagnosis, novel drug designs and after-care. The application of AI technology in healthcare systems promises impressive outcomes such as equalising healthcare, reducing mortality rate and human error, reducing medical costs, as well as reducing reliance on social services. In the light of the WHO "Decade of Healthy Ageing", AI applications are designed as digital innovations to support the quality of life for older persons. However, the emergence of evidence of different types of algorithmic bias in AI applications, ageism in the use of digital devices and platforms, as well as age bias in digital data suggests that the use of AI might have discriminatory effects on older population or even cause harm. This paper addresses the issue of age biases and age discrimination in AI applications in medicine and healthcare systems and try to identify main challenges in this area. It will reflect on the potential of AI applications to amplify the already existing health inequalities by discussing two levels where potential negative impact of AI on age inequalities might be observed. Firstly, we will address the technical level of age bias in algorithms and digital datasets (especially health data). Secondly, we will discuss the potential disparate outcomes of automatic decision-making systems (ADMs) used in healthcare on the older population. These examples will demonstrate, although only partially, how AI systems may create new structures of age inequalities and novel dimensions of exclusion in healthcare and medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.