Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36755547›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and translational science2023

Recruitment of diverse community health center patients in a pragmatic weight gain prevention trial.

Hailey N Miller, Miriam B Berger, Sandy Askew, Melissa C Kay, Miriam Chisholm, Gaurav Sirdeshmukh, Christina M Hopkins, Ashley Brewer, Abigail DeVries, Marni Holder and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and translational science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Hailey N MillerSchool of Nursing, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6045-6542
Miriam B BergerDuke Digital Health Science Center, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Sandy AskewDuke Digital Health Science Center, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Melissa C KayDuke Digital Health Science Center, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9695-3126
Miriam ChisholmDuke Digital Health Science Center, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Gaurav SirdeshmukhDuke Digital Health Science Center, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Christina M HopkinsDuke Digital Health Science Center, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Ashley BrewerPiedmont Health Services, Inc., Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Abigail DeVriesCityblock Health, Charlotte, NC, USA.
Marni HolderDepartment of Family Medicine, UNC-Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Gary G BennettDuke Digital Health Science Center, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Duke University · USPiedmont HealthCare · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of North Carolina at Charlotte · US

Funding

A Pragmatic Trial of a Digital Health Intervention to Prevent Weight Gain in Primary CareR18DK109518 · NIDDK · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI BENNETT, GARY G · 2016 to 2020
$3.3M
NIDDK NIH HHS R18 DK109518
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Pragmatic trials are needed to establish evidence-based obesity treatment in primary care settings, particularly in community health centers (CHCs) that serve populations at heightened risk of obesity. Recruiting a representative trial sample is a critical first step to informing care for diverse communities. We described recruitment strategies utilized in a pragmatic obesity trial and assessed the sociodemographic characteristics and odds of enrollment by recruitment strategy. Methods: We analyzed data from Balance, a pragmatic trial implemented within a network of CHCs. We recruited participants via health center-based and electronic health record (EHR)-informed mail recruitment. We analyzed associations between sociodemographic characteristics and the return rate of patient authorization forms (required for participation) from EHR-informed mail recruitment. We also compared sociodemographic characteristics and randomization odds by recruitment strategy after returning authorization forms. Results: Of the individuals recruited through EHR-informed mail recruitment, females were more likely than males to return authorization forms; however, there were no differences in rates of return by preferred language (English/Spanish) or age. Females; underrepresented racial and ethnic groups; Spanish speakers; younger adults; and those with lower education levels were recruited more successfully in the health center. In contrast, their counterparts were more responsive to mail recruitment. Once authorization forms were returned, the odds of being randomized did not significantly differ by recruitment method. Conclusion: Health center-based recruitment was essential to meeting recruitment targets in a pragmatic weight gain prevention trial, specifically for Hispanic and Spanish-speaking communities. Future pragmatic trials should consider leveraging in-person recruitment for underrepresented groups in research.

Indexed as

community health centerdiversityobesityPragmatic trialrecruitment

Identifiers

PMID36755547
PMCPMC9879902
OpenAlexW4303962069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.