Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36755339›Full record

Observational studyAntimicrobial resistance and infection control2023

In-hospital mortality and one-year survival of critically ill patients with cancer colonized or not with carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacteria or vancomycin-resistant enterococci: an observational study.

Antonio Paulo Nassar Junior, Giulia Medola Del Missier, Ana Paula Agnolon Praça, Ivan Leonardo Avelino França E Silva, Pedro Caruso

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Antimicrobial resistance and infection control, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria in Immunocompromised Patients.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Antonio Paulo Nassar JuniorIntensive Care Unit, AC Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-0522-7445
Giulia Medola Del MissierIntensive Care Unit, AC Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil.
Ana Paula Agnolon PraçaIntensive Care Unit, AC Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-8220-838X
Ivan Leonardo Avelino França E SilvaDepartment of Infectious Diseaes, AC Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-8182-7162
Pedro CarusoIntensive Care Unit, AC Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil. pedro.caruso@hc.fm.usp.br.ORCID 0000-0002-1051-8458
AC Camargo Hospital · BRHospital Israelita Albert Einstein · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with cancer are at risk of multidrug-resistant bacteria colonization, but association of colonization with in-hospital mortality and one-year survival has not been established in critically ill patients with cancer.

methodsUsing logistic and Cox-regression analyses adjusted for confounders, in adult patients admitted at intensive care unit (ICU) with active cancer, we evaluate the association of colonization by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria or vancomycin-resistant enterococci with in-hospital mortality and one-year survival.

resultsWe included 714 patients and among them 140 were colonized (19.6%). Colonized patients more frequently came from ward, had longer hospital length of stay before ICU admission, had unplanned ICU admission, had worse performance status, higher predicted mortality upon ICU admission, and more hematological malignancies than patients without colonization. None of the patients presented conversion of colonization to infection by the same bacteria during hospital stay, but 20.7% presented conversion to infection after hospital discharge. Colonized patients had a higher in-hospital mortality compared to patients without colonization (44.3 vs. 33.4%; p < 0.01), but adjusting for confounders, colonization was not associated with in-hospital mortality [Odds ratio = 1.03 (0.77-1.99)]. Additionally, adjusting for confounders, colonization was not associated with one-year survival [Hazard ratio = 1.10 (0.87-1.40)].

conclusionsAdult critically ill patients with active cancer and colonized by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria or vancomycin-resistant enterococci active cancer have a worse health status compared to patients without colonization. However, adjusting for confounders, colonization by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria or vancomycin-resistant enterococci are not associated with in-hospital mortality and one-year survival.

Indexed as

Gram-Positive Bacterial InfectionsHematologic NeoplasmsVancomycin-Resistant EnterococciAdultCarbapenemsCritical IllnessGram-Negative BacteriaHospital MortalityHumansCarbapenemsCarbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacteriaDrug resistanceHospital mortalityIntensive care unitsMultipleNeoplasmsSurvival analysisVancomycin-resistant enterococci

Identifiers

PMID36755339
PMCPMC9906932
OpenAlexW4319597851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.