Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36755300›Full record

ReviewParasites & vectors2023

Practical guide to the diagnostics of ruminant gastrointestinal nematodes, liver fluke and lungworm infection: interpretation and usability of results.

Gustavo Adolfo Sabatini, Fernando de Almeida Borges, Edwin Claerebout, Leonor Sicalo Gianechini, Johan Höglund, Ray Matthew Kaplan, Welber Daniel Zanetti Lopes, Sian Mitchell, Laura Rinaldi, Georg von Samson-Himmelstjerna and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Parasites & vectors, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
21.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Influence of water temperature, sedimentation and fecal refrigeration times on the recovery of Dictyocaulus viviparus larvae by two diagnostic techniques.Revista brasileira de parasitologia veterinaria = Brazilian journal of veterinary parasitology : Orgao Oficial do Colegio Brasileiro de Parasitologia Veterinaria · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Exploring animal enclosures and parasite interactions in Germany.International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Sustainable worm control in ruminants in Europe: current perspectives.Animal frontiers : the review magazine of animal agriculture · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 11 institutions in 9 countries.

Gustavo Adolfo SabatiniBoehringer Ingelheim Animal Health, Ingelheim am Rhein, Germany. gustavo.sabatini@boehringer-ingelheim.com.
Fernando de Almeida BorgesUniversidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande, Brazil.
Edwin ClaereboutGhent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Leonor Sicalo GianechiniUniversity of Georgia, Athens, USA.
Johan HöglundSwedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
Ray Matthew KaplanSt. George's University, St. George's, West Indies, Grenada.
Welber Daniel Zanetti LopesUniversidade Federal de Goias, Goiania, Brazil.
Sian MitchellThe former Animal and Plant Health Agency (APHA), Perth, UK.
Laura RinaldiUniversity of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Georg von Samson-HimmelstjernaFreie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Pedro SteffanFiel & Steffan Consultores Asociados, Tandil, Argentina.
Robert WoodgateUniversity of Adelaide, Roseworthy, Australia.
Animal and Plant Health Agency · GBBoehringer Ingelheim (Germany) · DEFreie Universität Berlin · DEGhent University Hospital · BESt. George's University · GDSwedish University of Agricultural Sciences · SEUniversidade Federal de Goiás · BRUniversidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul · BRUniversity of Adelaide · AUUniversity of Georgia · USUniversity of Naples Federico II · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The diagnostics of ruminant parasites remains one of the cornerstones for parasite control best practices. Field veterinarians have several techniques at their disposal (fecal egg count, coproculture, FAMACHA®, plasma pepsinogen, ELISA-Ostertagia, ELISA-Fasciola, Baermann and ELISA-Lungworm) for the identification and/or quantification of gastrointestinal nematodes, lungworms and liver fluke infecting small ruminants and cattle. Each of these diagnostic tools has its own strengths and weaknesses and is more appropriate for a specific production operation and/or age of the animal (young and adults). This review focuses on the usability and interpretation of the results of these diagnostic tools. The most advanced technical information on sampling, storage, advantages and limitations of each tool for different types of production operations and animal categories is provided.

Indexed as

Cattle DiseasesFasciola hepaticaNematodaAnimalsCattleFecesParasite Egg CountRuminantsBaermann and ELISA-LungwormCoprocultureDiagnosticsELISA-FasciolaELISA-OstertagiaFAMACHA®Fecal egg countParasitePlasma pepsinogenRuminants

Identifiers

PMID36755300
PMCPMC9906602
OpenAlexW4319600704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.