Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36755206›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS2023

Effect of Husbandry Practices on the Fecal Microbiota of C57BL/6J Breeding Colonies Housed in 2 Different Barrier Facilities in the Same Institution.

Libette J Roman, Antoine M Snijders, Hang Chang, Jian-Hua Mao, Kristina Ja Jones, Gregory W Lawson

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. mSphere · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Influence of Water Delivery Method on the Gut Microbiome in Laboratory Mice (Mus musculus).Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Libette J RomanOffice of Laboratory Animal Care, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, California.
Antoine M SnijdersBiological Systems and Engineering Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California.
Hang ChangBiological Systems and Engineering Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California.
Jian-Hua MaoBiological Systems and Engineering Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California.
Kristina Ja JonesOffice of Laboratory Animal Care, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, California.
Gregory W LawsonOffice of Laboratory Animal Care, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, California.
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory · USUniversity of California, Berkeley · US

Funding

Role of the gut microbiome in pesticide-induced effects on child neurodevelopmentR01ES031322 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIF-LAWRENC BERKELEY LAB · PI MAO, JIAN-HUA · 2020 to 2024
$1.4M
NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES031322
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evidence showing a relationship between the mouse gut microbiome and properties such as phenotype and reaction to therapeutic agents and other treatments has increased significantly over the past 20 to 30 y. Recent concerns regarding the reproducibility of animal experiments have underscored the importance of understanding this relationship and how differences in husbandry practices can affect the gut microbiome. The current study focuses on effects of different barrier practices in 2 barrier facilities at the same institution on the fecal microbiome of breeding C57Bl/6J mice. Ten female and 10 male C57Bl/6J mice were obtained in one shipment from Jackson Laboratories and were housed under different barrier conditions upon arrival. Fecal samples were collected on arrival and periodically thereafter and were sent to TransnetYX for microbiome analysis. Mice used for collection of feces were housed as breeding pairs, with a total of 5 breeding pairs per barrier. An additional fecal sample was collected from these mice at 8 wk after arrival. One F1 female and one F1 male from each breeding cage were housed as brother-sister breeding pairs and a fecal sample was collected from them at 8 wk of age. Brother-sister breeding colonies were continued through F3, with fecal samples for microbiome analysis were collected from each generation at 8 wk of age. Breeding colonies in the 2 barriers showed differences in relative abundance, α -diversity, and β -diversity. Our data indicate that differences in barrier husbandry practices, including the use of autoclaved cages, the degree of restricted access, feed treatment practices, and water provision practices, can affect fecal microbiome divergence in both the parental and filial generations of different breeding colonies. To our knowledge, this is the first study to examine the effect of barrier husbandry practices on the microbiome of breeding colonies through the F3 generation.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeMicrobiotaAnimalsFecesFemaleMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID36755206
PMCPMC9936858
OpenAlexW4313627489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.