Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36755051›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

A data-driven approach to the "Everesting" cycling challenge.

Junhyeon Seo, Bart Raeymaekers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Junhyeon SeoDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, 24061, USA.
Bart RaeymaekersDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, 24061, USA. bart.raeymaekers@vt.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The "Everesting" challenge is a cycling activity in which a cyclist repeats a hill until accumulating an elevation gain equal to the elevation of Mount Everest in a single ride. The challenge experienced a surge in interest during the COVID-19 pandemic and the cancelation of cycling races around the world that prompted cyclists to pursue alternative, individual activities. The time to complete the Everesting challenge depends on the fitness and talent of the cyclist, but also on the length and gradient of the hill, among other parameters. Hence, preparing an Everesting attempt requires understanding the relationship between the Everesting parameters and the time to complete the challenge. We use web-scraping to compile a database of publicly available Everesting attempts, and we quantify and rank the parameters that determine the time to complete the challenge. We also use unsupervised machine learning algorithms to segment cyclists into distinct groups according to their characteristics and performance. We conclude that the power per unit body mass of the cyclist and the tradeoff between the gradient of the hill and the distance are the most important considerations when attempting the Everesting challenge. As such, elite cyclists best select a hill with gradient > 12%, whereas amateur and recreational cyclists best select a hill with gradient < 10% to minimize the time to complete the Everesting challenge.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsAlgorithmsBicyclingExerciseHumans

Identifiers

PMID36755051
PMCPMC9907867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.