Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36755050›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Multi-centre deep learning for placenta segmentation in obstetric ultrasound with multi-observer and cross-country generalization.

Lisbeth Anita Andreasen, Aasa Feragen, Anders Nymark Christensen, Jonathan Kistrup Thybo, Morten Bo S Svendsen, Kilian Zepf, Karim Lekadir, Martin Grønnebæk Tolsgaard

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06232187 (Scan-AId), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
13.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06232187 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Scan-AId: Artificial Intelligence Support in Novice's Decision-making for Assessing Ultrasound Fetal Weight Estimation - A Randomized Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorCopenhagen Academy for Medical Education and SimulationRan2024 to 2024Enrolled75ConditionsFetal Weight, UltrasoundArmsArtificial Intelligence feedback for ultrasound EFW standard plane images
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Emerging applications of artificial intelligence for obstetric ultrasound: A scoping review.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Lisbeth Anita AndreasenCopenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation (CAMES) Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark. lisbethandreasen@icloud.com.
Aasa FeragenTechnical University of Denmark (DTU) Compute, Lyngby, Denmark.
Anders Nymark ChristensenTechnical University of Denmark (DTU) Compute, Lyngby, Denmark.
Jonathan Kistrup ThyboTechnical University of Denmark (DTU) Compute, Lyngby, Denmark.
Morten Bo S SvendsenCopenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation (CAMES) Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Kilian ZepfTechnical University of Denmark (DTU) Compute, Lyngby, Denmark.
Karim LekadirArtificial Intelligence in Medicine Lab (BCN-AIM), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Martin Grønnebæk TolsgaardCopenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation (CAMES) Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Technical University of Denmark · DKRigshospitalet · DKCopenhagen University Hospital · DKUniversitat de Barcelona · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The placenta is crucial to fetal well-being and it plays a significant role in the pathogenesis of hypertensive pregnancy disorders. Moreover, a timely diagnosis of placenta previa may save lives. Ultrasound is the primary imaging modality in pregnancy, but high-quality imaging depends on the access to equipment and staff, which is not possible in all settings. Convolutional neural networks may help standardize the acquisition of images for fetal diagnostics. Our aim was to develop a deep learning based model for classification and segmentation of the placenta in ultrasound images. We trained a model based on manual annotations of 7,500 ultrasound images to identify and segment the placenta. The model's performance was compared to annotations made by 25 clinicians (experts, trainees, midwives). The overall image classification accuracy was 81%. The average intersection over union score (IoU) reached 0.78. The model's accuracy was lower than experts' and trainees', but it outperformed all clinicians at delineating the placenta, IoU = 0.75 vs 0.69, 0.66, 0.59. The model was cross validated on 100 2nd trimester images from Barcelona, yielding an accuracy of 76%, IoU 0.68. In conclusion, we developed a model for automatic classification and segmentation of the placenta with consistent performance across different patient populations. It may be used for automated detection of placenta previa and enable future deep learning research in placental dysfunction.

Indexed as

Deep LearningPlacenta PreviaFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedPlacentaPregnancyUltrasonography, Prenatal

Identifiers

PMID36755050
PMCPMC9908915
OpenAlexW4319597860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.