Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36754956›Full record

ReviewNPJ primary care respiratory medicine2023

Key recommendations for primary care from the 2022 Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) update.

Mark L Levy, Leonard B Bacharier, Eric Bateman, Louis-Philippe Boulet, Chris Brightling, Roland Buhl, Guy Brusselle, Alvaro A Cruz, Jeffrey M Drazen, Liesbeth Duijts and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in NPJ primary care respiratory medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 185 papers, 11 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
185citing papers in PubMed, 11 pooled it
55.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

185 citing papers in PubMed, 11 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 317 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. New spirometry recommendations from the Brazilian Thoracic Association - 2024 update.Jornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia · 2025
    Guideline
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Effect of point application therapy for bronchial asthma: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.Journal of traditional Chinese medicine = Chung i tsa chih ying wen pan · 2026
    Trial
  16. A cluster randomized controlled trial of an electronic medical record-based pathway for pediatric asthma in primary care in Alberta.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2025
    Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

125 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 19 institutions in 12 countries.

Mark L LevyLocum General Practitioner, London, UK. mark-levy@btconnect.com.ORCID 0000-0002-1807-3246
Leonard B BacharierDepartment of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Eric BatemanDepartment of Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-5064-5849
Louis-Philippe BouletQuébec Heart and Lung Institute, Université Laval, Québec City, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3485-9393
Chris BrightlingInstitute for Lung Health, Leicester NIHR BRC, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Roland BuhlPulmonary Department, Mainz University Hospital, Mainz, Germany.
Guy BrusselleDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Alvaro A CruzProAR Foundation and Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.
Jeffrey M DrazenBrigham and Women's Hospital and Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Liesbeth DuijtsDivisions of Respiratory Medicine and Allergology and Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Louise FlemingNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7268-7433
Hiromasa InoueDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Kagoshima University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Kagoshima, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-8080-3812
Fanny W S KoDepartment of Medicine and Therapeutics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8454-0087
Jerry A KrishnanBreathe Chicago Center, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5525-4778
Kevin MortimerLiverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8118-8871
Paulo M PitrezHospital Santa Casa de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-7319-1133
Aziz SheikhDepartment of Primary Care Research & Development, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Arzu YorgancıoğluDepartment of Pulmonology, Celal Bayar University, Manisa, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-4032-0944
Helen K ReddelThe Woolcock Institute of Medical Research and The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6695-6350
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USChinese University of Hong Kong · HKErasmus MC · NLGhent University Hospital · BEImperial College London · GBJohannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DEKagoshima University · JPManisa Celal Bayar University · TRRoyal College of General Practitioners · GBSanta Casa Hospital · BRThe University of Sydney · AUUniversidade Federal da Bahia · BRUniversité Laval · CAUniversity of Cape Town · ZAUniversity of Edinburgh · GBUniversity of Illinois Chicago · USUniversity of Leicester · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GBVanderbilt University Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) was established in 1993 by the World Health Organization and the US National Heart Lung and Blood Institute to improve asthma awareness, prevention and management worldwide. GINA develops and publishes evidence-based, annually updated resources for clinicians. GINA guidance is adopted by national asthma guidelines in many countries, adapted to fit local healthcare systems, practices, and resource availability. GINA is independent of industry, funded by the sale and licensing of its materials. This review summarizes key practical guidance for primary care from the 2022 GINA strategy report. It provides guidance on confirming the diagnosis of asthma using spirometry or peak expiratory flow. GINA recommends that all adults, adolescents and most children with asthma should receive inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)-containing therapy to reduce the risk of severe exacerbations, either taken regularly, or (for adults and adolescents with "mild" asthma) as combination ICS-formoterol taken as needed for symptom relief. For patients with moderate-severe asthma, the preferred regimen is maintenance-and-reliever therapy (MART) with ICS-formoterol. Asthma treatment is not "one size fits all"; GINA recommends individualized assessment, adjustment, and review of treatment. As many patients with difficult-to-treat or severe asthma are not referred early for specialist review, we provide updated guidance for primary care on diagnosis, further investigation, optimization and treatment of severe asthma across secondary and tertiary care. While the GINA strategy has global relevance, we recognize that there are special considerations for its adoption in low- and middle-income countries, particularly the current poor access to inhaled medications.

Indexed as

Anti-Asthmatic AgentsAsthmaAdministration, InhalationAdolescentAdrenal Cortex HormonesAdultChildFormoterol FumarateHumansPrimary Health CareAdrenal Cortex HormonesAnti-Asthmatic AgentsFormoterol Fumarate

Identifiers

PMID36754956
PMCPMC9907191
OpenAlexW4319596235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.