Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36753699›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2023

Brexucabtagene Autoleucel for Relapsed or Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma in Standard-of-Care Practice: Results From the US Lymphoma CAR T Consortium.

Yucai Wang, Preetesh Jain, Frederick L Locke, Matthew J Maurer, Matthew J Frank, Javier L Munoz, Saurabh Dahiya, Amer M Beitinjaneh, Miriam T Jacobs, Joseph P Mcguirk and 19 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 114 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
114citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

114 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Author response to Zhang and Chen.British journal of haematology · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

54 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

29 authors.

Yucai WangMayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.ORCID 0000-0002-1576-8341
Preetesh JainThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.ORCID 0000-0003-2735-168X
Frederick L LockeMoffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL.ORCID 0000-0001-9063-6691
Matthew J MaurerMayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.ORCID 0000-0002-1867-0526
Matthew J FrankStanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA.ORCID 0000-0002-2356-3354
Javier L MunozMayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ.ORCID 0000-0002-9060-8911
Saurabh DahiyaUniversity of Maryland School of Medicine, Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD.ORCID 0000-0001-8291-1796
Amer M BeitinjanehUniversity of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL.
Miriam T JacobsWashington University School of Medicine, Siteman Cancer Center, St Louis, MO.ORCID 0000-0002-8831-7592
Joseph P McguirkUniversity of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS.ORCID 0000-0002-0539-4796
Julie M VoseUniversity of Nebraska Medical Center, Buffett Cancer Center, Omaha, NE.ORCID 0000-0003-1015-7434
Andre GoyJohn Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack Meridian Health, Hackensack, NJ.ORCID 0000-0001-5125-6522
Charalambos AndreadisUniversity of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
Brian T HillCleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.
Kathleen A DorritieUPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA.
Olalekan O OluwoleVanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN.ORCID 0000-0001-8525-9641
Abhinav DeolWayne State University, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI.ORCID 0000-0003-0947-8871
Jonas PaludoMayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.ORCID 0000-0002-7350-5531
Bijal ShahMoffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL.
Trent WangUniversity of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL.ORCID 0000-0001-5685-7204
Rahul BanerjeeUniversity of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.ORCID 0000-0003-3781-5441
David B MiklosStanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA.ORCID 0000-0003-0717-4305
Aaron P RapoportUniversity of Maryland School of Medicine, Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD.ORCID 0000-0003-0043-3562
Lazaros LekakisUniversity of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL.
Armin GhobadiWashington University School of Medicine, Siteman Cancer Center, St Louis, MO.
Sattva S NeelapuThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.ORCID 0000-0003-1045-4914
Yi LinMayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.ORCID 0000-0002-1556-6416
Michael L WangThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.ORCID 0000-0001-9748-5486
Michael D JainMoffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL.ORCID 0000-0002-7789-1257

Funding

TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCHP30CA076292 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA · PI KENNETH Lynn WRIGHT · 1998 to 2026
$93.5M
Washington University Paul Calabresi K12 Career Development Award for Clinical OncologyK12CA167540 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI John F. Dipersio, Ramaswamy Govindan · 2012 to 2026
$11.7M
NCI NIH HHS K12 CA167540NCI NIH HHS P30 CA076292
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeBrexucabtagene autoleucel (brexu-cel) is an autologous CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy approved for relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). This therapy was approved on the basis of the single-arm phase II ZUMA-2 trial, which showed best overall and complete response rates of 91% and 68%, respectively. We report clinical outcomes with brexu-cel in the standard-of-care setting for the approved indication. PATIENTS AND

methodsPatients who underwent leukapheresis between August 1, 2020 and December 31, 2021, at 16 US institutions, with an intent to manufacture commercial brexu-cel for relapsed/refractory MCL, were included. Patient data were collected for analyses of responses, outcomes, and toxicities as per standard guidelines.

resultsOf 189 patients who underwent leukapheresis, 168 (89%) received brexu-cel infusion. Of leukapheresed patients, 79% would not have met ZUMA-2 eligibility criteria. Best overall and complete response rates were 90% and 82%, respectively. At a median follow-up of 14.3 months after infusion, the estimates for 6- and 12-month progression-free survival (PFS) were 69% (95% CI, 61 to 75) and 59% (95% CI, 51 to 66), respectively. The nonrelapse mortality was 9.1% at 1 year, primarily because of infections. Grade 3 or higher cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity occurred in 8% and 32%, respectively. In univariable analysis, high-risk simplified MCL international prognostic index, high Ki-67,

conclusionIn the standard-of-care setting, the efficacy and toxicity of brexu-cel were consistent with those reported in the ZUMA-2 trial. Tumor-intrinsic features of MCL, and possibly recent bendamustine exposure, may be associated with inferior efficacy outcomes.

Indexed as

Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, DiffuseLymphoma, Mantle-CellReceptors, Chimeric AntigenAdultAntigens, CD19Bendamustine HydrochlorideHumansImmunotherapy, AdoptiveNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalAntigens, CD19Bendamustine Hydrochloridebrexucabtagene autoleucelReceptors, Chimeric Antigen

Identifiers

PMID36753699
PMCPMC10489553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.