Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36753687›Full record

ArticleJCO precision oncology2023

Mutation Spectrum in Liquid Versus Solid Biopsies From Patients With Advanced Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Carcinoma.

Stian Knappskog, Tobias Grob, Andreas Venizelos, Ursula Amstutz, Geir O Hjortland, Inger M Lothe, Christian Kersten, Eva Hofsli, Anna Sundlöv, Hege Elvebakken and 5 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCO precision oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 10 institutions in 4 countries.

Stian KnappskogK.G. Jebsen Center for Genome-Directed Cancer Therapy, Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-4153-1655
Tobias GrobInstitute of Pathology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-6298-9796
Andreas VenizelosK.G. Jebsen Center for Genome-Directed Cancer Therapy, Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Ursula AmstutzInstitute of Clinical Chemistry, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-0880-456X
Geir O HjortlandDepartment of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Inger M LotheDepartment of Pathology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Christian KerstenDepartment of Research, Hospital of Southern Norway, Kristiansand, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-5691-2944
Eva HofsliDepartment of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Anna SundlövDepartment of Oncology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-1565-3496
Hege ElvebakkenDepartment of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Herish GarresoriDepartment of Oncology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.
Anne CouvelardDepartment of Pathology, Université Paris Cité and AP-HP, Bichat Hospital, Paris, France.
Johanna SvenssonDepartment of Oncology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-3292-7719
Halfdan SorbyeDepartment of Oncology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Aurel PerrenInstitute of Clinical Chemistry, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-6819-6092
Haukeland University Hospital · NONorwegian University of Science and Technology · NOOslo University Hospital · NOUniversity Hospital of Bern · CHHospital of Southern Norway · NOLund University · SESahlgrenska University Hospital · SEStavanger University Hospital · NOUniversité Paris Cité · FRUniversity of Bern · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeGastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas (GEP-NEC) are rare and have a poor prognosis. Most GEP-NEC are diagnosed with metastatic disease, with only minor biopsies available for molecular diagnostics. We assessed the applicability of liquid biopsies for molecular profiling of GEP-NEC. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe performed massive parallel sequencing of 76 cancer-related genes in circulating tumor DNA from 50 patients with advanced GEP-NEC and compared findings to previous analyses of solid tumor biopsies from the same patients. Plasma samples were collected before therapy, and the median time span between blood and tissue sampling was 25 days.

resultsWe detected 178 somatic mutations in the liquid biopsies, 127 (71%) were also detected in the solid biopsies, whereas 51 (29%) were unique to the liquid biopsies. In the same 76 genes, we previously detected 199 somatic mutations (single nucleotide variants) in solid biopsies, of which 127 (64%) were also now detected in liquid biopsies. In exploratory subgroup assessments, concordance was higher in patients with liver metastases (

conclusionLiquid biopsy analyses may be an applicable alternative to solid biopsies in GEP-NEC. Liquid biopsies may add additional mutations compared with tumor biopsies alone and could be useful for biomarker assessment in clinical trials for these patients.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, NeuroendocrinePancreatic NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorBiopsyHumansMutationBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID36753687
PMCPMC9928986
OpenAlexW4319457751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.