Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36753551›Full record

ArticleScience advances2023

Terrestrial amplification of past, present, and future climate change.

Alan M Seltzer, Pierre-Henri Blard, Steven C Sherwood, Masa Kageyama

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Evolution of Pliocene-Pleistocene tropical terrestrial Andean temperature amplification.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Tropical Andean climate variations since the last deglaciation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alan M SeltzerDepartment of Marine Chemistry and Geochemistry, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2870-1215
Pierre-Henri BlardCentre de Recherches Pétrographiques et Géochimiques, CNRS, Université de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
Steven C SherwoodClimate Change Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7420-8216
Masa KageyamaLaboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement/Institut Pierre-Simon Laplace (LSCE/IPSL), UMR CEA-CNRS-UVSQ, Université Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.ORCID 0000-0003-0822-5880

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Terrestrial amplification (TA) of land warming relative to oceans is apparent in recent climatic observations. TA results from land-sea coupling of moisture and heat and is therefore important for predicting future warming and water availability. However, the theoretical basis for TA has never been tested outside the short instrumental period, and the spatial pattern and amplitude of TA remain uncertain. Here, we investigate TA during the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM; ~20 thousand years) in the low latitudes, where the theory is most applicable. We find remarkable consistency between paleotemperature proxies, theory, and climate model simulations of both LGM and future climates. Paleoclimate data thus provide crucial new support for TA, refining the range of future low-latitude, low-elevation TA to [Formula: see text] (95% confidence interval), i.e., land warming ~40% more than oceans. The observed data model theory agreement helps reconcile LGM marine and terrestrial paleotemperature proxies, with implications for equilibrium climate sensitivity.

Identifiers

PMID36753551
PMCPMC9908018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.