Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36753506›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2023

Development and evaluation of a multiplex serodiagnostic bead assay (BurkPx) for accurate melioidosis diagnosis.

Erik W Settles, Derek Sonderegger, Austin B Shannon, Kimberly R Celona, Rachel Lederer, Jinhee Yi, Courtney Seavey, Kyle Headley, Mimi Mbegbu, Maxx Harvey and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Antibodies toMicroorganisms · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Vaccines · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Erik W SettlesThe Pathogen and Microbiome Institute, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-4331-3683
Derek SondereggerDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona, United States of America.
Austin B ShannonThe Pathogen and Microbiome Institute, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona, United States of America.
Kimberly R CelonaThe Pathogen and Microbiome Institute, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona, United States of America.
Rachel LedererThe Pathogen and Microbiome Institute, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona, United States of America.
Jinhee YiThe Pathogen and Microbiome Institute, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona, United States of America.
Courtney SeaveyThe Pathogen and Microbiome Institute, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona, United States of America.
Kyle HeadleyThe Pathogen and Microbiome Institute, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona, United States of America.
Mimi MbegbuThe Pathogen and Microbiome Institute, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona, United States of America.
Maxx HarveyThe Pathogen and Microbiome Institute, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona, United States of America.
Mitch KeenerThe Pathogen and Microbiome Institute, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona, United States of America.
Chris AllenderThe Pathogen and Microbiome Institute, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona, United States of America.
Heidie HornstraThe Pathogen and Microbiome Institute, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona, United States of America.
Fernando P MonroyDepartment of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona, United States of America.
Celeste WoerleGlobal and Tropical Health Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia.
Vanessa TheobaldGlobal and Tropical Health Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia.
Mark MayoGlobal and Tropical Health Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia.
Bart J CurrieGlobal and Tropical Health Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia.
Paul KeimThe Pathogen and Microbiome Institute, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-0089-5820
Northern Arizona University · USCharles Darwin University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Burkholderia pseudomallei, the causative agent of melioidosis, is a gram-negative soil bacterium well recognized in Southeast Asia and northern Australia. However, wider and expanding global distribution of B. pseudomallei has been elucidated. Early diagnosis is critical for commencing the specific therapy required to optimize outcome. Serological testing using the indirect hemagglutination (IHA) antibody assay has long been used to augment diagnosis of melioidosis and to monitor progress. However, cross reactivity and prior exposure may complicate the diagnosis of current clinical disease (melioidosis). The goal of our study was to develop and initially evaluate a serology assay (BurkPx) that capitalized upon host response to multiple antigens. Antigens were selected from previous studies for expression/purification and conjugation to microspheres for multiantigen analysis. Selected serum samples from non-melioidosis controls and serial samples from culture-confirmed melioidosis patients were used to characterize the diagnostic power of individual and combined antigens at two times post admission. Multiple variable models were developed to evaluate multivariate antigen reactivity, identify important antigens, and determine sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of melioidosis. The final multiplex assay had a diagnostic sensitivity of 90% and specificity of 93%, which was superior to any single antigen in side-by-side comparisons. The sensitivity of the assay started at >85% for the initial serum sample after admission and increased to 94% 21 days later. Weighting antigen contribution to each model indicated that certain antigen contributed to diagnosis more than others, which suggests that the number of antigens in the assay can be decreased. In summation, the BurkPx assay can facilitate the diagnosis of melioidosis and potentially improve on currently available serology assays. Further evaluation is now required in both melioidosis-endemic and non-endemic settings.

Indexed as

Burkholderia pseudomalleiMelioidosisAntibodies, BacterialAntigens, BacterialHumansSensitivity and SpecificityAntibodies, BacterialAntigens, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID36753506
PMCPMC9907819
OpenAlexW4319460976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.