Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36753410›Full record

Trial reportCommunity dentistry and oral epidemiology2023

De-implementing opioid prescribing in a dental group practice: Lessons learned.

Donald Brad Rindal, Jan Gryczynski, Stephen E Asche, Anjali R Truitt, Sheryl M Kane, Donald C Worley, Shannon G Mitchell

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Community dentistry and oral epidemiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Donald Brad RindalHealthPartners Institute, Bloomington, Minnesota, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7436-4638
Jan GryczynskiFriends Research Institute, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Stephen E AscheHealthPartners Institute, Bloomington, Minnesota, USA.
Anjali R TruittHealthPartners Institute, Bloomington, Minnesota, USA.
Sheryl M KaneHealthPartners Institute, Bloomington, Minnesota, USA.
Donald C WorleyHealthPartners Institute, Bloomington, Minnesota, USA.
Shannon G MitchellFriends Research Institute, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2841-1085
HealthPartners · USFriends Research Institute · US

Funding

De-Implementing Opioid Use and Implementing Optimal Pain Management Following Dental ExtractionsU01DE027441 · NIDCR · HEALTHPARTNERS INSTITUTE · PI RINDAL, D. BRAD · 2017 to 2020
$3.3M
NIDCR NIH HHS U01 DE027441
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDrug overdose has become a leading cause of accidental death in the United States. Between 2000 and 2015, the rate of deaths from drug overdoses increased 137%, including a 200% increase in the rate of overdose deaths involving opioids (including opioid pain relievers and heroin). Unnecessary opioid prescribing is one of the factors driving this epidemic.

objectivesThe primary objective of this paper is to share lessons learned while conducting a randomized trial to de-implement opioids for post-extraction pain management utilizing clinical decision support (CDS) with and without patient education. The lessons learned from conducting this trial in a real-world setting can be applied to future dissemination and implementation oral health research.

methodsThe sources informing lessons learned were generated from qualitative interviews conducted with 20 of the forty-nine dental providers involved in the study following the implementation phase of the trial. Ongoing policy, social and environmental factors were tracked throughout the study.

resultsDental providers in the trial identified the impact of training that involved health professionals sharing information about the personal impact of pain and opioid use. Additionally, they found utility in being presented with a dashboard detailing their prescribing patterns related to other dentists. For the 30 general dentists with access to the CDS, use of its portal varied widely, with most using it 10%-49% of the time related to extractions.

conclusionsIn the context of a downward trend in opioid prescribing and considering the influence of the COVID pandemic during the trial, dental providers indicated benefit in training about negative personal impacts of prescribing opioids, and personally relevant feedback about their prescribing patterns. Only modest use of the CDS was realized. Implementation of this trial was impacted by governmental and health system policies and the COVID pandemic, prompt the consideration of implications regarding continuing ways to limit opioid prescribing among dental providers.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidCOVID-19Group Practice, DentalHumansPainPractice Patterns, Dentists'United StatesAnalgesics, Opioidanalgesicsclinical decision support systemsdentists' practice patternsdiffusion of innovationopiate overdoseopioidpain managementrandomized controlled trials

Identifiers

PMID36753410
PMCPMC9993482
OpenAlexW4319462012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.