ReviewRevista brasileira de enfermagem2023
Nurses' Work Methods Assessment Scale: a study of content validation.
Review in Revista brasileira de enfermagem, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Work-Family Conflict and Intention to Leave Among Nursing Professionals: A Cross-Sectional Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Construction and content validation of a checklist for effective communication of nursing care to newborns.Revista brasileira de enfermagem · 2026Article
- Nurses' Work Methods Assessment Scale: Turkish Validity and Reliability Study.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence in the Organization of Nursing Care: A Scoping Review.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2024Article
- Nurses' perspectives on nurses' work methods.Revista brasileira de enfermagem · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo develop and validate the content of the Nurses' Work Methods Assessment Scale.
methodsMethodological study conducted between January and February 2022, based on the Quality Standards for Nursing Care and Imogene King's framework. A literature review was previously undertaken to design the scale. The content validation was carried out by 23 experts.
resultsThe initial version consisted of 40 items organized in four work methods identified in the literature. In the first dimension, from ten items, seven were considered, and one was reformulated. Seven of the initial ten items were considered in the second version. The third dimension consisted of seven items. In the fourth dimension, three items were reformulated, and three were excluded, leaving seven items. The final version ended with 28 items, whose Content Validity Index ranged between 0.83 and 1.
conclusionsThe involvement of experts has become pivotal in the development and validation of the items, providing confidence to the continuity of psychometric procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.